rs117358479

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2

The NM_177438.3(DICER1):​c.20A>G​(p.Gln7Arg) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00232 in 1,613,722 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 5 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. Q7K) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: š‘“ 0.0017 ( 1 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes š‘“: 0.0024 ( 4 hom. )

Consequence

DICER1
NM_177438.3 missense

Scores

3
16

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:18O:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.93

Publications

10 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
DICER1 (HGNC:17098): (dicer 1, ribonuclease III) This gene encodes a protein possessing an RNA helicase motif containing a DEXH box in its amino terminus and an RNA motif in the carboxy terminus. The encoded protein functions as a ribonuclease and is required by the RNA interference and small temporal RNA (stRNA) pathways to produce the active small RNA component that represses gene expression. This protein also acts as a strong antiviral agent with activity against RNA viruses, including the Zika and SARS-CoV-2 viruses. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2021]
DICER1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • DICER1-related tumor predisposition
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
  • pleuropulmonary blastoma
    Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
  • DICER1 syndrome
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • global developmental delay - lung cysts - overgrowth - Wilms tumor syndrome
    Inheritance: Unknown Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -13 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.007442862).
BP6
Variant 14-95133439-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr14-95133439-T-C is described in ClinVar as Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity. ClinVar VariationId is 133962.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00167 (255/152316) while in subpopulation NFE AF = 0.00323 (220/68022). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00288. There are 1 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 108 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 255 AD,Unknown gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
DICER1NM_177438.3 linkc.20A>G p.Gln7Arg missense_variant Exon 2 of 27 ENST00000343455.8 NP_803187.1 Q9UPY3-1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
DICER1ENST00000343455.8 linkc.20A>G p.Gln7Arg missense_variant Exon 2 of 27 1 NM_177438.3 ENSP00000343745.3 Q9UPY3-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00168
AC:
255
AN:
152198
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000193
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000720
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.000865
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00166
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00323
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00239
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.00169
AC:
420
AN:
248074
AF XY:
0.00189
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000185
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00107
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.000399
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.000463
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00272
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000983
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00238
AC:
3483
AN:
1461406
Hom.:
4
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.00246
AC XY:
1791
AN XY:
726920
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000239
AC:
8
AN:
33474
American (AMR)
AF:
0.000985
AC:
44
AN:
44660
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.000498
AC:
13
AN:
26122
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
39690
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00178
AC:
153
AN:
86156
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.000487
AC:
26
AN:
53378
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00208
AC:
12
AN:
5768
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00279
AC:
3097
AN:
1111778
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00215
AC:
130
AN:
60380
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.473
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
191
382
572
763
954
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
108
216
324
432
540
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00167
AC:
255
AN:
152316
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.00145
AC XY:
108
AN XY:
74476
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000192
AC:
8
AN:
41578
American (AMR)
AF:
0.000719
AC:
11
AN:
15292
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.000865
AC:
3
AN:
3470
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5196
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00166
AC:
8
AN:
4828
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10608
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00323
AC:
220
AN:
68022
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00236
AC:
5
AN:
2116
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.502
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
12
24
35
47
59
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Variant carriers
0
4
8
12
16
20
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.00259
Hom.:
1
Bravo
AF:
0.00175
TwinsUK
AF:
0.00189
AC:
7
ALSPAC
AF:
0.00208
AC:
8
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.000454
AC:
2
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.00349
AC:
30
ExAC
AF:
0.00161
AC:
196
EpiCase
AF:
0.00305
EpiControl
AF:
0.00226

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:18Other:1
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Uncertain:1Benign:8
Apr 01, 2025
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

DICER1: BP4, BS1 -

Nov 03, 2021
Institute for Clinical Genetics, University Hospital TU Dresden, University Hospital TU Dresden
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jul 20, 2020
GeneDx
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 24728327, 27320919, 28615371, 21266384) -

-
Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 24, 2017
Center for Pediatric Genomic Medicine, Children's Mercy Hospital and Clinics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Nov 11, 2023
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not specified Benign:3Other:1
Mar 04, 2025
Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jul 28, 2021
Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Sep 19, 2013
ITMI
Significance:not provided
Review Status:no classification provided
Collection Method:reference population

- -

Jul 01, 2019
Foulkes Cancer Genetics LDI, Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:curation

ACMG criteria met: BS1, BS2, BP1, BP4, BP6 -

DICER1-related tumor predisposition Benign:3
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Feb 04, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

May 28, 2019
Mendelics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:2
Mar 17, 2021
Sema4, Sema4
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:curation

- -

Apr 12, 2019
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Breast neoplasm Benign:1
Jan 01, 2019
Institute of Human Genetics, University of Leipzig Medical Center
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was identified as compound heterozygous. -

Pleuropulmonary blastoma Benign:1
Jul 07, 2023
KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.098
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.50
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.48
CADD
Benign
17
DANN
Uncertain
0.99
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.21
T;T;T;T;.;T;T
Eigen
Benign
-0.43
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.25
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
0.94
D
LIST_S2
Benign
0.76
.;.;T;.;T;.;T
M_CAP
Benign
0.0059
T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0074
T;T;T;T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-1.0
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
-0.34
N;N;N;N;N;.;.
PhyloP100
1.9
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.57
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-0.16
N;N;N;N;N;N;N
REVEL
Benign
0.048
Sift
Benign
0.032
D;D;D;D;D;D;D
Sift4G
Benign
0.34
T;T;T;T;T;.;.
Polyphen
0.0
B;B;B;B;.;.;.
Vest4
0.22
MVP
0.56
MPC
0.53
ClinPred
0.0063
T
GERP RS
1.8
PromoterAI
-0.0060
Neutral
Varity_R
0.055
gMVP
0.71
Mutation Taster
=81/19
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs117358479; hg19: chr14-95599776; COSMIC: COSV58626575; API