rs117419007

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -14 ACMG points: 0P and 14B. BP4_StrongBP6BP7BS1BS2

The NM_017950.4(CCDC40):​c.630C>T​(p.Ser210Ser) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00592 in 1,613,620 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 46 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0048 ( 5 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0060 ( 41 hom. )

Consequence

CCDC40
NM_017950.4 synonymous

Scores

1
1

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:6

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.244

Publications

7 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
CCDC40 (HGNC:26090): (coiled-coil domain 40 molecular ruler complex subunit) This gene encodes a protein that is necessary for motile cilia function. It functions in correct left-right axis formation by regulating the assembly of the inner dynein arm and the dynein regulatory complexes, which control ciliary beat. Mutations in this gene cause ciliary dyskinesia type 15, a disorder due to defects in cilia motility. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2011]
CCDC40 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • primary ciliary dyskinesia 15
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: G2P, ClinGen, Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), PanelApp Australia, Laboratory for Molecular Medicine
  • primary ciliary dyskinesia
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • autoimmune disease
    Inheritance: AR Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -14 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.69).
BP6
Variant 17-80047356-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr17-80047356-C-T is described in ClinVar as Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity. ClinVar VariationId is 197317.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.244 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00478 (728/152296) while in subpopulation NFE AF = 0.00566 (385/68018). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00519. There are 5 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 368 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 5 AR,AD gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
CCDC40NM_017950.4 linkc.630C>T p.Ser210Ser synonymous_variant Exon 4 of 20 ENST00000397545.9 NP_060420.2 Q4G0X9-1
CCDC40NM_001243342.2 linkc.630C>T p.Ser210Ser synonymous_variant Exon 4 of 18 NP_001230271.1 Q4G0X9-2
CCDC40NM_001330508.2 linkc.630C>T p.Ser210Ser synonymous_variant Exon 4 of 11 NP_001317437.1 Q4G0X9-4

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
CCDC40ENST00000397545.9 linkc.630C>T p.Ser210Ser synonymous_variant Exon 4 of 20 5 NM_017950.4 ENSP00000380679.4 Q4G0X9-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00478
AC:
727
AN:
152178
Hom.:
5
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00106
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00347
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00635
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00476
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.0179
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.0127
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00564
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00335
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.00598
AC:
1484
AN:
248064
AF XY:
0.00603
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000976
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00241
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00628
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.000111
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0219
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00582
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00564
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00604
AC:
8821
AN:
1461324
Hom.:
41
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.00604
AC XY:
4388
AN XY:
726986
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000896
AC:
30
AN:
33478
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00298
AC:
133
AN:
44702
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00597
AC:
156
AN:
26130
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
39696
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00517
AC:
446
AN:
86202
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0224
AC:
1189
AN:
53192
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00382
AC:
22
AN:
5756
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00587
AC:
6526
AN:
1111798
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00528
AC:
319
AN:
60370
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.463
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
442
884
1325
1767
2209
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
256
512
768
1024
1280
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00478
AC:
728
AN:
152296
Hom.:
5
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.00494
AC XY:
368
AN XY:
74478
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00106
AC:
44
AN:
41570
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00346
AC:
53
AN:
15306
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00635
AC:
22
AN:
3466
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5182
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00476
AC:
23
AN:
4828
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0179
AC:
190
AN:
10610
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.0136
AC:
4
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00566
AC:
385
AN:
68018
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00332
AC:
7
AN:
2110
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.499
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
39
77
116
154
193
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
20
40
60
80
100
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.00517
Hom.:
12
Bravo
AF:
0.00356
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00231
AC:
8
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.00474
EpiControl
AF:
0.00540

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:6
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:2
Feb 17, 2015
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Primary ciliary dyskinesia Benign:2
Jan 29, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jul 08, 2016
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

not provided Benign:2
Nov 05, 2020
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Nov 01, 2024
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

CCDC40: BP4, BP7, BS2 -

Primary ciliary dyskinesia 15 Uncertain:1
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.69
CADD
Benign
5.9
DANN
Uncertain
0.98
PhyloP100
0.24
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.1
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.040
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs117419007; hg19: chr17-78021155; API