rs117667651

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2

The NM_001378615.1(CC2D2A):​c.4438-9C>A variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000506 in 1,546,552 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00051 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00051 ( 2 hom. )

Consequence

CC2D2A
NM_001378615.1 intron

Scores

2
Splicing: ADA: 0.005747
2

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:2B:5

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.02

Publications

3 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
CC2D2A (HGNC:29253): (coiled-coil and C2 domain containing 2A) This gene encodes a coiled-coil and calcium binding domain protein that appears to play a critical role in cilia formation. Mutations in this gene cause Meckel syndrome type 6, as well as Joubert syndrome type 9. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Sep 2009]
CC2D2A Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • ciliopathy
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
  • Joubert syndrome 9
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Genomics England PanelApp, G2P
  • retinitis pigmentosa 93
    Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
  • COACH syndrome 1
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • Joubert syndrome with oculorenal defect
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • Meckel syndrome
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -13 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.79).
BP6
Variant 4-15597398-C-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr4-15597398-C-A is described in ClinVar as Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity. ClinVar VariationId is 238279.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population eas. GnomAdExome4 allele frequency = 0.000506 (706/1394330) while in subpopulation EAS AF = 0.0128 (458/35760). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0118. There are 2 homozygotes in GnomAdExome4. There are 366 alleles in the male GnomAdExome4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 29. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 2 AR gene

Variant Effect in Transcripts

ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_001378615.1. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.

RefSeq Transcripts

Selected
GeneTranscriptTagsHGVScHGVSpEffectExon RankProteinUniProt
CC2D2A
NM_001378615.1
MANE Select
c.4438-9C>A
intron
N/ANP_001365544.1
CC2D2A
NM_001080522.2
c.4438-9C>A
intron
N/ANP_001073991.2
CC2D2A
NM_001378617.1
c.4291-9C>A
intron
N/ANP_001365546.1

Ensembl Transcripts

Selected
GeneTranscriptTagsHGVScHGVSpEffectExon RankProteinUniProt
CC2D2A
ENST00000424120.6
TSL:5 MANE Select
c.4438-9C>A
intron
N/AENSP00000403465.1
CC2D2A
ENST00000503292.6
TSL:1
c.4438-9C>A
intron
N/AENSP00000421809.1
CC2D2A
ENST00000634028.2
TSL:1
n.4232-9C>A
intron
N/AENSP00000488669.2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000506
AC:
77
AN:
152104
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0000241
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00157
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00808
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00145
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000147
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000956
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.00141
AC:
220
AN:
156338
AF XY:
0.00142
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00430
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00953
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000163
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000686
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000506
AC:
706
AN:
1394330
Hom.:
2
Cov.:
29
AF XY:
0.000532
AC XY:
366
AN XY:
687850
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0000319
AC:
1
AN:
31392
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00413
AC:
145
AN:
35124
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
25106
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.0128
AC:
458
AN:
35760
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.000740
AC:
58
AN:
78406
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
49290
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5690
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00000558
AC:
6
AN:
1075710
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.000657
AC:
38
AN:
57852
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.477
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
38
76
115
153
191
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
10
20
30
40
50
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000506
AC:
77
AN:
152222
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000699
AC XY:
52
AN XY:
74428
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0000241
AC:
1
AN:
41544
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00157
AC:
24
AN:
15298
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3472
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00810
AC:
42
AN:
5188
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00145
AC:
7
AN:
4824
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10590
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0000147
AC:
1
AN:
67986
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.000946
AC:
2
AN:
2114
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.502
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
4
8
12
16
20
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Variant carriers
0
2
4
6
8
10
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.000591
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000865
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00404
AC:
14
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:2Benign:5
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:2
Feb 01, 2016
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Dec 11, 2024
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Meckel syndrome, type 6 Uncertain:1
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease.

Joubert syndrome 9 Uncertain:1
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease.

not provided Benign:1
Jan 30, 2021
GeneDx
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Meckel-Gruber syndrome;C0431399:Joubert syndrome Benign:1
Jan 06, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

CC2D2A-related disorder Benign:1
Jul 17, 2019
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is classified as benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications).

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.9

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.79
CADD
Benign
13
DANN
Benign
0.46
PhyloP100
1.0
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
dbscSNV1_ADA
Benign
0.0057
dbscSNV1_RF
Benign
0.046
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs117667651; hg19: chr4-15599021; API