rs117672175
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points: 0P and 10B. BP4_StrongBP6BP7BS2
The NM_000088.4(COL1A1):c.2595C>T(p.Arg865Arg) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00124 in 1,609,402 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.00067 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0013 ( 1 hom. )
Consequence
COL1A1
NM_000088.4 synonymous
NM_000088.4 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -0.162
Genes affected
COL1A1 (HGNC:2197): (collagen type I alpha 1 chain) This gene encodes the pro-alpha1 chains of type I collagen whose triple helix comprises two alpha1 chains and one alpha2 chain. Type I is a fibril-forming collagen found in most connective tissues and is abundant in bone, cornea, dermis and tendon. Mutations in this gene are associated with osteogenesis imperfecta types I-IV, Ehlers-Danlos syndrome type VIIA, Ehlers-Danlos syndrome Classical type, Caffey Disease and idiopathic osteoporosis. Reciprocal translocations between chromosomes 17 and 22, where this gene and the gene for platelet-derived growth factor beta are located, are associated with a particular type of skin tumor called dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans, resulting from unregulated expression of the growth factor. Two transcripts, resulting from the use of alternate polyadenylation signals, have been identified for this gene. [provided by R. Dalgleish, Feb 2008]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.5).
BP6
Variant 17-50189877-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr17-50189877-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 35915.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=5, Uncertain_significance=1, Benign=5}. Variant chr17-50189877-G-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.162 with no splicing effect.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 101 AD gene.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COL1A1 | NM_000088.4 | c.2595C>T | p.Arg865Arg | synonymous_variant | 37/51 | ENST00000225964.10 | NP_000079.2 | |
COL1A1 | XM_011524341.2 | c.2397C>T | p.Arg799Arg | synonymous_variant | 34/48 | XP_011522643.1 | ||
COL1A1 | XM_005257058.5 | c.2595C>T | p.Arg865Arg | synonymous_variant | 37/49 | XP_005257115.2 | ||
COL1A1 | XM_005257059.5 | c.1677C>T | p.Arg559Arg | synonymous_variant | 24/38 | XP_005257116.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COL1A1 | ENST00000225964.10 | c.2595C>T | p.Arg865Arg | synonymous_variant | 37/51 | 1 | NM_000088.4 | ENSP00000225964.6 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000668 AC: 101AN: 151114Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
101
AN:
151114
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000578 AC: 140AN: 242060Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000610 AC XY: 80AN XY: 131240
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
140
AN:
242060
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
80
AN XY:
131240
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00129 AC: 1888AN: 1458170Hom.: 1 Cov.: 39 AF XY: 0.00129 AC XY: 936AN XY: 725136
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
1888
AN:
1458170
Hom.:
Cov.:
39
AF XY:
AC XY:
936
AN XY:
725136
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000668 AC: 101AN: 151232Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000514 AC XY: 38AN XY: 73868
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
101
AN:
151232
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
38
AN XY:
73868
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:10
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:3
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Apr 19, 2021 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Feb 15, 2023 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | May 01, 2024 | COL1A1: BP4, BP7, BS1 - |
not specified Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Jun 19, 2024 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Mar 30, 2015 | - - |
Infantile cortical hyperostosis Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. - |
Osteogenesis imperfecta Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Ehlers-Danlos syndrome Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, The Hospital for Sick Children | Nov 29, 2021 | - - |
Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, arthrochalasia type Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Mar 19, 2020 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Osteogenesis imperfecta type I Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 22, 2024 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at