rs117747744

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -8 ACMG points: 0P and 8B. BP4_StrongBS2

The NM_001384474.1(LOXHD1):ā€‹c.889A>Cā€‹(p.Thr297Pro) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00114 in 1,551,766 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 3 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/18 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: š‘“ 0.00050 ( 1 hom., cov: 31)
Exomes š‘“: 0.0012 ( 2 hom. )

Consequence

LOXHD1
NM_001384474.1 missense

Scores

1
16

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:6B:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.51
Variant links:
Genes affected
LOXHD1 (HGNC:26521): (lipoxygenase homology PLAT domains 1) This gene encodes a highly conserved protein consisting entirely of PLAT (polycystin/lipoxygenase/alpha-toxin) domains, thought to be involved in targeting proteins to the plasma membrane. Studies in mice show that this gene is expressed in the mechanosensory hair cells in the inner ear, and mutations in this gene lead to auditory defects, indicating that this gene is essential for normal hair cell function. Screening of human families segregating deafness identified a mutation in this gene which causes DFNB77, a progressive form of autosomal-recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss (ARNSHL). Alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been noted for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Mar 2010]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -8 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.023494154).
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 2 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
LOXHD1NM_001384474.1 linkuse as main transcriptc.889A>C p.Thr297Pro missense_variant 8/41 ENST00000642948.1 NP_001371403.1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
LOXHD1ENST00000642948.1 linkuse as main transcriptc.889A>C p.Thr297Pro missense_variant 8/41 NM_001384474.1 ENSP00000496347 P1
LOXHD1ENST00000536736.5 linkuse as main transcriptc.889A>C p.Thr297Pro missense_variant 8/405 ENSP00000444586
LOXHD1ENST00000441551.6 linkuse as main transcriptc.889A>C p.Thr297Pro missense_variant 8/395 ENSP00000387621 Q8IVV2-1
LOXHD1ENST00000335730.6 linkuse as main transcriptn.202A>C non_coding_transcript_exon_variant 1/272

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000500
AC:
76
AN:
152142
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
31
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000241
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000970
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000453
AC:
72
AN:
158960
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.000454
AC XY:
38
AN XY:
83628
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0000808
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00114
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00121
AC:
1699
AN:
1399506
Hom.:
2
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00123
AC XY:
847
AN XY:
690254
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0000949
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.0000560
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00154
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000483
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000499
AC:
76
AN:
152260
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.000470
AC XY:
35
AN XY:
74446
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.000241
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.000970
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Alfa
AF:
0.00136
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000544
TwinsUK
AF:
0.00135
AC:
5
ALSPAC
AF:
0.000519
AC:
2
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.00126
AC:
4
ExAC
AF:
0.000220
AC:
6

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:6Benign:1
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Uncertain:3Benign:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpOct 17, 2022This sequence change replaces threonine, which is neutral and polar, with proline, which is neutral and non-polar, at codon 297 of the LOXHD1 protein (p.Thr297Pro). This variant is present in population databases (rs117747744, gnomAD 0.1%). This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with LOXHD1-related conditions. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 178405). Algorithms developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function (SIFT, PolyPhen-2, Align-GVGD) all suggest that this variant is likely to be tolerated. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center-- -
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingJoint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+-- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInstitute for Clinical Genetics, University Hospital TU Dresden, University Hospital TU DresdenNov 03, 2021- -
Autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 77 Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingNatera, Inc.Sep 16, 2020- -
not specified Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLaboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized MedicineNov 25, 2013Variant classified as Uncertain Significance - Favor Benign. The Thr297Pro varia nt in LOXHD1 has not been reported in individuals with hearing loss, but has bee n identified in 1.2% (2/170) of European American and in 0.6% (1/178) of British chromosomes by the 1000 Genomes Project, as well as in 0.1% (4/3182) of Europea n American chromosomes by the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (http://evs.gs.wash ington.edu/EVS/; dbSNP rs117747744). Although this variant has been seen in the general population, its frequency is not high enough to rule out a pathogenic ro le. The threonine (Thr) residue at position 297 is not conserved through species , and computational analyses (biochemical amino acid properties, AlignGVGD, Poly Phen2, and SIFT) suggest that the Thr297Pro variant may not impact the protein, though this information is not predictive enough to rule out pathogenicity. In s ummary, the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with cert ainty; however, based upon its presence in the general population and the comput ational data, we lean towards a more likely benign role. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.18
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.48
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.50
CADD
Benign
14
DANN
Benign
0.91
Eigen
Benign
-0.43
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.42
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
0.82
D
LIST_S2
Benign
0.64
T;T;T
M_CAP
Benign
0.0077
T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.023
T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-1.1
T
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
N;N;N
PrimateAI
Benign
0.36
T
PROVEAN
Benign
0.32
N;.;.
REVEL
Benign
0.071
Sift
Benign
0.21
T;.;.
Sift4G
Benign
0.24
T;.;T
Polyphen
0.045
B;.;.
Vest4
0.25
MVP
0.040
ClinPred
0.036
T
GERP RS
1.4
Varity_R
0.16
gMVP
0.51

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs117747744; hg19: chr18-44181425; API