rs117820198

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_032043.3(BRIP1):​c.918+15T>A variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000881 in 1,602,738 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 22 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0012 ( 5 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00085 ( 17 hom. )

Consequence

BRIP1
NM_032043.3 intron

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:15

Conservation

PhyloP100: 2.37
Variant links:
Genes affected
BRIP1 (HGNC:20473): (BRCA1 interacting helicase 1) The protein encoded by this gene is a member of the RecQ DEAH helicase family and interacts with the BRCT repeats of breast cancer, type 1 (BRCA1). The bound complex is important in the normal double-strand break repair function of breast cancer, type 1 (BRCA1). This gene may be a target of germline cancer-inducing mutations. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.77).
BP6
Variant 17-61808452-A-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr17-61808452-A-T is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 136583.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr17-61808452-A-T is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr17-61808452-A-T is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population eas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00119 (181/152296) while in subpopulation EAS AF= 0.0327 (170/5192). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0287. There are 5 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 100 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 5 AD,AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
BRIP1NM_032043.3 linkc.918+15T>A intron_variant Intron 7 of 19 ENST00000259008.7 NP_114432.2 Q9BX63-1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
BRIP1ENST00000259008.7 linkc.918+15T>A intron_variant Intron 7 of 19 1 NM_032043.3 ENSP00000259008.2 Q9BX63-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00118
AC:
179
AN:
152178
Hom.:
5
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000327
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.0323
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000622
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000294
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000478
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00306
AC:
767
AN:
250380
Hom.:
11
AF XY:
0.00284
AC XY:
384
AN XY:
135366
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0000579
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.0404
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.000392
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000266
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00131
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000849
AC:
1231
AN:
1450442
Hom.:
17
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
0.000832
AC XY:
601
AN XY:
722178
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.0000447
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.0275
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.000558
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0000118
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00132
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00119
AC:
181
AN:
152296
Hom.:
5
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00134
AC XY:
100
AN XY:
74478
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.000327
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.0327
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.000623
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0000294
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.000473
Alfa
AF:
0.000430
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.00144
Asia WGS
AF:
0.0120
AC:
41
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:15
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:3
Feb 05, 2014
GeneDx
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Mar 04, 2025
Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center
Significance: Benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Fanconi anemia complementation group J Benign:2
Apr 27, 2017
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases allowed determination this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. -

Jul 05, 2016
Counsyl
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:2
-
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Sep 03, 2021
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:2
Apr 08, 2015
Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Dec 01, 2015
University of Washington Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of Washington
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Breast and/or ovarian cancer Benign:1
Jul 05, 2021
CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Familial cancer of breast;C1836860:Fanconi anemia complementation group J Benign:1
Feb 04, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Malignant tumor of breast Benign:1
-
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System
Significance: Benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

The BRIP1 r.(spl?) variant was identified in 9 of 714 proband chromosomes (frequency: 0.01) from individuals or families with breast cancer and was not identified in 1728 control chromosomes from healthy individuals (Cao 2009). The variant was also identified in dbSBP (ID: rs117820198) as other, ClinVar and Clinvitae (benign by Counsyl, Color Genomics, GeneDx; and likely benign by Illumina and University of Washington), Zhejiang Colon Cancer Database (1x as unknown) databases. The variant was not identified in Cosmic or MutDB databases. The variant was also identified by our laboratory in 1 individuals with breast cancer who is of Asian descent. The variant was identified in control databases in 777 of 276108 chromosomes (11 homozygous individuals) at a frequency of 0.003 increasing the likelihood that this may be a low frequency benign variant in certain populations of origin (Genome Aggregation Consortium Feb 27, 2017). The variant was identified in the following populations at a frequency greater than 1%: East Asian in 751 of 18858 chromosomes (freq: 0.04). The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information this variant meets our laboratory's criteria to be classified as benign. -

Familial cancer of breast Benign:1
Jul 07, 2023
KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Benign:1
Apr 19, 2022
National Health Laboratory Service, Universitas Academic Hospital and University of the Free State
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Ovarian neoplasm Benign:1
Jul 05, 2016
Counsyl
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.77
CADD
Benign
15
DANN
Benign
0.69

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs117820198; hg19: chr17-59885813; API