rs11797456

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -16 ACMG points: 0P and 16B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS2

The NM_021120.4(DLG3):​c.304G>A​(p.Gly102Ser) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00561 in 1,191,109 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 14 homozygotes. There are 2,067 hemizygotes in GnomAD. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 12/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0039 ( 0 hom., 95 hem., cov: 24)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0058 ( 14 hom. 1972 hem. )

Consequence

DLG3
NM_021120.4 missense

Scores

3
13

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:7

Conservation

PhyloP100: 3.40

Publications

5 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
DLG3 (HGNC:2902): (discs large MAGUK scaffold protein 3) This gene encodes a member of the membrane-associated guanylate kinase protein family. The encoded protein may play a role in clustering of NMDA receptors at excitatory synapses. It may also negatively regulate cell proliferation through interaction with the C-terminal region of the adenomatosis polyposis coli tumor suppressor protein. Mutations in this gene have been associated with X-linked cognitive disability. Alternatively spliced transcript variants have been described. [provided by RefSeq, Oct 2009]
DLG3 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • intellectual disability, X-linked 90
    Inheritance: XL Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
  • non-syndromic X-linked intellectual disability
    Inheritance: XL Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: ClinGen, Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -16 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.004940212).
BP6
Variant X-70445505-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chrX-70445505-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 96020.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BS2
High Hemizygotes in GnomAd4 at 95 XL gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
DLG3NM_021120.4 linkc.304G>A p.Gly102Ser missense_variant Exon 1 of 19 ENST00000374360.8 NP_066943.2 Q92796-1Q59FY1
DLG3XM_006724625.3 linkc.304G>A p.Gly102Ser missense_variant Exon 1 of 20 XP_006724688.1
DLG3XM_011530883.2 linkc.304G>A p.Gly102Ser missense_variant Exon 1 of 19 XP_011529185.1
DLG3XM_006724626.3 linkc.304G>A p.Gly102Ser missense_variant Exon 1 of 20 XP_006724689.1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
DLG3ENST00000374360.8 linkc.304G>A p.Gly102Ser missense_variant Exon 1 of 19 1 NM_021120.4 ENSP00000363480.3 Q92796-1
DLG3ENST00000194900.8 linkc.304G>A p.Gly102Ser missense_variant Exon 1 of 21 5 ENSP00000194900.4 Q5JUW8
DLG3ENST00000463252.5 linkn.370G>A non_coding_transcript_exon_variant Exon 1 of 19 5

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00388
AC:
438
AN:
112803
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
24
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000902
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.0117
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00102
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.000376
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00271
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00417
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00691
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00261
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.00333
AC:
458
AN:
137498
AF XY:
0.00329
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000832
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000756
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.000760
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00179
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00672
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00331
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00579
AC:
6245
AN:
1078256
Hom.:
14
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00563
AC XY:
1972
AN XY:
350430
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000423
AC:
11
AN:
25994
American (AMR)
AF:
0.000766
AC:
25
AN:
32657
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.000949
AC:
18
AN:
18971
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.0000344
AC:
1
AN:
29078
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.000875
AC:
45
AN:
51419
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00251
AC:
96
AN:
38182
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.000974
AC:
4
AN:
4106
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00699
AC:
5818
AN:
832506
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00501
AC:
227
AN:
45343
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.479
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
278
555
833
1110
1388
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
218
436
654
872
1090
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00388
AC:
438
AN:
112853
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
24
AF XY:
0.00271
AC XY:
95
AN XY:
35001
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000900
AC:
28
AN:
31125
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00101
AC:
11
AN:
10848
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.000376
AC:
1
AN:
2658
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3520
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
2756
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00271
AC:
17
AN:
6279
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00457
AC:
1
AN:
219
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00692
AC:
368
AN:
53216
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00258
AC:
4
AN:
1551
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.497
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
16
32
49
65
81
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
10
20
30
40
50
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.00523
Hom.:
227
Bravo
AF:
0.00328
TwinsUK
AF:
0.00647
AC:
24
ALSPAC
AF:
0.00450
AC:
13
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.000806
AC:
3
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.00443
AC:
29
ExAC
AF:
0.00295
AC:
346

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:7
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:3
Dec 31, 2019
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

Jan 13, 2016
Center for Pediatric Genomic Medicine, Children's Mercy Hospital and Clinics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not specified Benign:2
Apr 07, 2014
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Nov 28, 2016
Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Inborn genetic diseases Benign:1
Dec 20, 2019
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Intellectual disability, X-linked 90 Benign:1
Jan 31, 2025
Equipe Genetique des Anomalies du Developpement, Université de Bourgogne
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:curation

Literature review. This variant is a missense which replaces a glycine with a serine at position 102. Hemizygous pathogenic variants in DLG3 are reported in an autosomal dominant intellectual disability (OMIM #300850). This variant is present in 2067 males individuals in the population database gnomAD (v4.1.0). It has previously been reported as benign in ClinVar and in the literature (PMID:25649377). In silico prediction scores are in favor of an absence of effect. Based on these evidences, the variant was classified as likely benign. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.061
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.70
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.78
CADD
Benign
22
DANN
Uncertain
0.98
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.039
T;T
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.48
N
LIST_S2
Uncertain
0.89
D;D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0049
T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.99
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
0.20
.;N
PhyloP100
3.4
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.73
T
PROVEAN
Benign
0.28
N;N
REVEL
Benign
0.064
Sift
Benign
0.21
T;T
Sift4G
Benign
0.35
T;T
Polyphen
0.0010
.;B
Vest4
0.043
MVP
0.38
MPC
0.86
ClinPred
0.0056
T
GERP RS
3.8
Varity_R
0.094
gMVP
0.48
Mutation Taster
=98/2
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs11797456; hg19: chrX-69665355; COSMIC: COSV99530293; API