rs118049905
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2
The NM_199242.3(UNC13D):c.2896C>T(p.Arg966Trp) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00578 in 1,580,010 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 29 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R966G) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_199242.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UNC13D | NM_199242.3 | c.2896C>T | p.Arg966Trp | missense_variant | 30/32 | ENST00000207549.9 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UNC13D | ENST00000207549.9 | c.2896C>T | p.Arg966Trp | missense_variant | 30/32 | 1 | NM_199242.3 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes ? AF: 0.00373 AC: 568AN: 152162Hom.: 1 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00441 AC: 852AN: 193394Hom.: 2 AF XY: 0.00448 AC XY: 464AN XY: 103618
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00599 AC: 8558AN: 1427730Hom.: 28 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00582 AC XY: 4111AN XY: 706932
GnomAD4 genome ? AF: 0.00373 AC: 568AN: 152280Hom.: 1 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00337 AC XY: 251AN XY: 74458
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:1Benign:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Dec 08, 2020 | In silico analysis supports that this missense variant has a deleterious effect on protein structure/function; Identified in the heterozygous state without a second UNC13D variant in individuals with familial hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis in the literature (Zhang et al., 2014); these individuals also had a single heterozygous variant in the PRF1 gene suggesting possible digenic inheritance; Identified in the heterozygous state in patients with suspected bleeding disorders in published literature, although one of the patients also had a variant in the RUNX1 gene (Ferrari et al., 2018); This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 24916509, 28399723) - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Oct 01, 2023 | UNC13D: BS2 - |
Familial hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis 3 Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Invitae | Jan 31, 2024 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. - |
not specified Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Autoinflammatory syndrome Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, The Hospital for Sick Children | Jul 19, 2021 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at