rs118117962

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -17 ACMG points: 0P and 17B. BP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_016219.5(MAN1B1):​c.2052C>T​(p.Tyr684Tyr) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0365 in 1,613,800 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1,258 homozygotes. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.029 ( 95 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.037 ( 1163 hom. )

Consequence

MAN1B1
NM_016219.5 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:6

Conservation

PhyloP100: -1.75

Publications

5 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
MAN1B1 (HGNC:6823): (mannosidase alpha class 1B member 1) This gene encodes an enzyme belonging to the glycosyl hydrolase 47 family. This enzyme functions in N-glycan biosynthesis, and is a class I alpha-1,2-mannosidase that specifically converts Man9GlcNAc to Man8GlcNAc isomer B. It is required for N-glycan trimming to Man5-6GlcNAc2 in the endoplasmic-reticulum-associated degradation pathway. Mutations in this gene cause autosomal-recessive intellectual disability. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. A related pseudogene has been identified on chromosome 11. [provided by RefSeq, Dec 2011]
MAN1B1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • MAN1B1-congenital disorder of glycosylation
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, ClinGen
  • Rafiq syndrome
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: G2P, PanelApp Australia, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics
  • autosomal recessive non-syndromic intellectual disability
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -17 ACMG points.

BP6
Variant 9-137108543-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr9-137108543-C-T is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 129578.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-1.75 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.0289 (4397/152298) while in subpopulation NFE AF = 0.0418 (2845/68020). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0405. There are 95 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 2092 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 95 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
MAN1B1NM_016219.5 linkc.2052C>T p.Tyr684Tyr synonymous_variant Exon 13 of 13 ENST00000371589.9 NP_057303.2
MAN1B1NR_045720.2 linkn.2042C>T non_coding_transcript_exon_variant Exon 13 of 13
MAN1B1NR_045721.2 linkn.2198C>T non_coding_transcript_exon_variant Exon 14 of 14
MAN1B1XM_006716945.5 linkc.*581C>T downstream_gene_variant XP_006717008.1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
MAN1B1ENST00000371589.9 linkc.2052C>T p.Tyr684Tyr synonymous_variant Exon 13 of 13 1 NM_016219.5 ENSP00000360645.4

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0289
AC:
4397
AN:
152180
Hom.:
95
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00719
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.0680
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0299
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.0714
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00231
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.0205
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.0288
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.0222
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0418
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0301
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.0302
AC:
7598
AN:
251480
AF XY:
0.0311
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00566
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0183
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.0687
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.000163
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0263
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0418
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.0366
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0373
AC:
54570
AN:
1461502
Hom.:
1163
Cov.:
35
AF XY:
0.0370
AC XY:
26920
AN XY:
727054
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00535
AC:
179
AN:
33478
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0186
AC:
833
AN:
44724
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0687
AC:
1796
AN:
26132
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.000151
AC:
6
AN:
39698
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0214
AC:
1849
AN:
86258
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0279
AC:
1481
AN:
53168
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.0418
AC:
241
AN:
5768
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0415
AC:
46122
AN:
1111888
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0342
AC:
2063
AN:
60388
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.464
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
3182
6364
9546
12728
15910
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
1678
3356
5034
6712
8390
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0289
AC:
4397
AN:
152298
Hom.:
95
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0281
AC XY:
2092
AN XY:
74462
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00717
AC:
298
AN:
41572
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0299
AC:
457
AN:
15294
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0714
AC:
248
AN:
3472
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00231
AC:
12
AN:
5186
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0207
AC:
100
AN:
4822
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0288
AC:
306
AN:
10612
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.0204
AC:
6
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0418
AC:
2845
AN:
68020
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0298
AC:
63
AN:
2114
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.501
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
217
435
652
870
1087
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
58
116
174
232
290
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.0381
Hom.:
56
Bravo
AF:
0.0285
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00866
AC:
30
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:6
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Rafiq syndrome Benign:2
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:2
-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

Feb 14, 2020
GeneDx
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not specified Benign:1
-
Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Likely benign based on allele frequency in 1000 Genomes Project or ESP global frequency and its presence in a patient with a rare or unrelated disease phenotype. NOT Sanger confirmed. -

Inborn genetic diseases Benign:1
Apr 20, 2016
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.80
CADD
Benign
0.65
DANN
Benign
0.82
PhyloP100
-1.8
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.7
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs118117962; hg19: chr9-140002995; COSMIC: COSV65370916; COSMIC: COSV65370916; API