rs118175551

Variant names:

• chr19-36101725-G-A
• rs118175551
• NM_001083961.2:c.3033G>A

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_Strong BP6_Very_Strong BP7 BS1 BS2

The NM_001083961.2(WDR62):​c.3033G>A​(p.Pro1011Pro) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00156 in 1,551,608 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 57 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

• Frequency:
  • Genomes: 𝑓 0.0021 (9 hom., cov: 33)
  • Exomes 𝑓: 0.0015 (48 hom.)
• Consequence: WDR62 NM_001083961.2 synonymous
• Clinical Significance: Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:6
• Conservation: PhyloP100: -0.549

Genes affected

WDR62 (HGNC:24502): (WD repeat domain 62) This gene is proposed to play a role in cerebral cortical development. Mutations in this gene have been associated with microencephaly, cortical malformations, and cognitive disability. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Jan 2011]

ACMG classification

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.

• BP4: Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.76).
• BP6: Variant 19-36101725-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr19-36101725-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 160278.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr19-36101725-G-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
• BP7: Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.549 with no splicing effect.
• BS1: Variant frequency is greater than expected in population eas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00214 (326/152262) while in subpopulation EAS AF= 0.0547 (283/5174). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0495. There are 9 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 185 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck.
• BS2: High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 9 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
WDR62	NM_001083961.2	c.3033G>A	p.Pro1011Pro	synonymous_variant	Exon 25 of 32	ENST00000401500.7	NP_001077430.1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
WDR62	ENST00000401500.7	c.3033G>A	p.Pro1011Pro	synonymous_variant	Exon 25 of 32	1	NM_001083961.2	ENSP00000384792.1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00214 AC: 325 AN: 152144 Hom.: 9 Cov.: 33

Gnomad AFR AF: 0.000434

Gnomad AMI AF: 0.00

Gnomad AMR AF: 0.000131

Gnomad ASJ AF: 0.000576

Gnomad EAS AF: 0.0544

Gnomad SAS AF: 0.00228

Gnomad FIN AF: 0.00

Gnomad MID AF: 0.00

Gnomad NFE AF: 0.000118

Gnomad OTH AF: 0.000957

GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00438 AC: 685 AN: 156492 Hom.: 18 AF XY: 0.00405 AC XY: 334 AN XY: 82512

Gnomad AFR exome AF: 0.000230

Gnomad AMR exome AF: 0.000403

Gnomad ASJ exome AF: 0.000587

Gnomad EAS exome AF: 0.0554

Gnomad SAS exome AF: 0.000701

Gnomad FIN exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad NFE exome AF: 0.000132

Gnomad OTH exome AF: 0.00316

GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00150 AC: 2097 AN: 1399346 Hom.: 48 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00145 AC XY: 1002 AN XY: 690216

Gnomad4 AFR exome AF: 0.000222

Gnomad4 AMR exome AF: 0.000307

Gnomad4 ASJ exome AF: 0.000596

Gnomad4 EAS exome AF: 0.0501

Gnomad4 SAS exome AF: 0.000782

Gnomad4 FIN exome AF: 0.0000204

Gnomad4 NFE exome AF: 0.0000408

Gnomad4 OTH exome AF: 0.00283

GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00214 AC: 326 AN: 152262 Hom.: 9 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00248 AC XY: 185 AN XY: 74448

Gnomad4 AFR AF: 0.000433

Gnomad4 AMR AF: 0.000131

Gnomad4 ASJ AF: 0.000576

Gnomad4 EAS AF: 0.0547

Gnomad4 SAS AF: 0.00228

Gnomad4 FIN AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 NFE AF: 0.000118

Gnomad4 OTH AF: 0.000947

Alfa AF: 0.000328 Hom.: 0

Bravo AF: 0.00247

Asia WGS AF: 0.0180 AC: 63 AN: 3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign

Submissions summary: Benign:6

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:3

Apr 25, 2017

Athena Diagnostics

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Mar 19, 2015

GeneDx

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

-

Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Microcephaly 2, primary, autosomal recessive, with or without cortical malformations Benign:2

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Dec 05, 2021

Genome-Nilou Lab

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:1

Nov 27, 2024

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
BayesDel_noAF	Benign	-0.76
CADD	Benign	2.2
DANN	Benign	0.79

Splicing

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)		0.0		Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs118175551; hg19: chr19-36592627; COSMIC: COSV54332769;