Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points: 1P and 20B. PP2BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The NM_000368.5(TSC1):c.1342C>T(p.Pro448Ser) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000658 in 1,614,020 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 9 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. P448L) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
TSC1 (HGNC:12362): (TSC complex subunit 1) This gene is a tumor suppressor gene that encodes the growth inhibitory protein hamartin. The encoded protein interacts with and stabilizes the GTPase activating protein tuberin. This hamartin-tuberin complex negatively regulates mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1) signaling which is a major regulator of anabolic cell growth. This protein also functions as a co-chaperone for Hsp90 that inhibits its ATPase activity. This protein functions as a facilitator of Hsp90-mediated folding of kinase and non-kinase clients, including TSC2 and thereby preventing their ubiquitination and proteasomal degradation. Mutations in this gene have been associated with tuberous sclerosis and lymphangioleiomyomatosis. [provided by RefSeq, May 2022]
PP2 - Missense variant in a gene that has a low rate of benign missense variation and in which missense variants are a common mechanism of disease
Missense variant where missense usually causes diseases, TSC1
BP4
?
BP4 - Multiple lines of computational evidence suggest no impact on gene or gene product (conservation, evolutionary, splicing impact, etc.)
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.004213333).
BP6
?
BP6 - Reputable source recently reports variant as benign, but the evidence is not available to the laboratory to perform an independent evaluation
Variant 9-132906827-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr9-132906827-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 48770.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr9-132906827-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr9-132906827-G-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BS1
?
BS1 - Allele frequency is greater than expected for disorder
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00345 (526/152246) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.0118 (491/41526). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.011. There are 4 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 253 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
?
BS2 - Observed in a healthy adult individual for a recessive (homozygous), dominant (heterozygous), or X-linked (hemizygous) disorder, with full penetrance expected at an early age
Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
-
- -
not provided, no classification provided
reference population
ITMI
Sep 19, 2013
- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter
clinical testing
GeneDx
Dec 23, 2013
This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter
clinical testing
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
-
- -
Benign, no assertion criteria provided
clinical testing
Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center
-
- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter
clinical testing
Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano
Nov 01, 2019
- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter
clinical testing
Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago
Jul 19, 2021
- -
Tuberous sclerosis 1 Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter
clinical testing
Invitae
Feb 01, 2024
- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter
clinical testing
KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center
Jul 07, 2023
- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter
clinical testing
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Feb 02, 2018
This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. The evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was sufficient to determine this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter
clinical testing
Genome-Nilou Lab
Nov 07, 2021
- -
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter
clinical testing
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Feb 01, 2023
TSC1: BP4, BS1, BS2 -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter
clinical testing
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Nov 29, 2023
- -
Isolated focal cortical dysplasia type II Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter
clinical testing
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Feb 02, 2018
This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases allowed determination this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter
clinical testing
Ambry Genetics
Sep 24, 2014
This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -