rs118203518

Variant names:

Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_000368.5(TSC1):c.1342C>T(p.Pro448Ser) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000658 in 1,614,020 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 9 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. P448L) has been classified as Benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0035 ( 4 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00037 ( 5 hom. )

Consequence

TSC1
NM_000368.5 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:17O:3

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.163

Variant links:

Genes affected

TSC1 (HGNC:12362): (TSC complex subunit 1) This gene is a tumor suppressor gene that encodes the growth inhibitory protein hamartin. The encoded protein interacts with and stabilizes the GTPase activating protein tuberin. This hamartin-tuberin complex negatively regulates mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1) signaling which is a major regulator of anabolic cell growth. This protein also functions as a co-chaperone for Hsp90 that inhibits its ATPase activity. This protein functions as a facilitator of Hsp90-mediated folding of kinase and non-kinase clients, including TSC2 and thereby preventing their ubiquitination and proteasomal degradation. Mutations in this gene have been associated with tuberous sclerosis and lymphangioleiomyomatosis. [provided by RefSeq, May 2022]

TSC1 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.004213333).

BP6

Variant 9-132906827-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr9-132906827-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 48770.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr9-132906827-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr9-132906827-G-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00345 (526/152246) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.0118 (491/41526). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.011. There are 4 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 253 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.

BS2

High AC in GnomAd4 at 526 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
TSC1	NM_000368.5 link	c.1342C>T	p.Pro448Ser	missense_variant	Exon 14 of 23	ENST00000298552.9	NP_000359.1	Q92574-1Q86WV8X5D9D2

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
TSC1	ENST00000298552.9 link	c.1342C>T	p.Pro448Ser	missense_variant	Exon 14 of 23	1	NM_000368.5	ENSP00000298552.3		Q92574-1
TSC1	ENST00000490179.4 link	c.1342C>T	p.Pro448Ser	missense_variant	Exon 15 of 24	3		ENSP00000495533.2		A0A2R8Y6S8

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00344

AC:

523

AN:

152128

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0118

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00151

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000294

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00478

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.000860

AC:

216

AN:

251070

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.000619

AC XY:

AN XY:

135712

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.0114

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000694

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.0000654

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0000176

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000327

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000367

AC:

536

AN:

1461774

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000349

AC XY:

254

AN XY:

727188

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.0128

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.000783

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.0000464

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.00000630

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.000894

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00345

AC:

526

AN:

152246

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00340

AC XY:

253

AN XY:

74436

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.0118

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00150

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.0000294

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00473

Alfa

AF:

0.000532

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00388

ESP6500AA

AF:

0.0113

AC:

ESP6500EA

AF:

0.00

AC:

ExAC

AF:

0.00103

AC:

125

Asia WGS

AF:

0.00144

AC:

AN:

3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:17Other:3

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified

Benign:7Other:1

Sep 19, 2013

ITMI

Significance: not provided

Review Status: no classification provided

Collection Method: reference population

- -

Nov 01, 2019

Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Nov 01, 2019

Athena Diagnostics

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jul 19, 2021

Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Dec 23, 2013

GeneDx

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Tuberous sclerosis 1

Benign:5

Jul 07, 2023

KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Sep 05, 2024

Myriad Genetics, Inc.

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is considered benign. Homozygosity has been confirmed in one or more individuals. As homozygosity for pathogenic variants in this gene is generally assumed to result in embryonic lethality, this variant is unlikely to be pathogenic. This variant has been observed at a population frequency that is significantly greater than expected given the associated disease prevalence and penetrance. -

Nov 07, 2021

Genome-Nilou Lab

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Feb 04, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Feb 02, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. The evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was sufficient to determine this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. -

not provided

Benign:3

Mar 04, 2024

ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Aug 01, 2024

CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

TSC1: BP4, BS1 -

Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: not provided

- -

Isolated focal cortical dysplasia type II

Benign:1

Feb 02, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases allowed determination this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome

Benign:1

Sep 24, 2014

Ambry Genetics

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Tuberous sclerosis syndrome

Other:1

Tuberous sclerosis database (TSC1)

Significance: not provided

Review Status: no classification provided

Collection Method: curation

- -

Autism spectrum disorder

Other:1

Tuberous sclerosis database (TSC1)

Significance: not provided

Review Status: no classification provided

Collection Method: curation

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.061

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.52

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.51

CADD

Benign

7.8

DANN

Benign

0.29

DEOGEN2

Benign

0.40

T;.;T;.;.;T;.;T;.;.;.;.

Eigen

Benign

-1.1

Eigen_PC

Benign

-1.0

FATHMM_MKL

Benign

0.065

LIST_S2

Benign

0.66

.;T;T;T;T;.;.;.;T;T;.;T

MetaRNN

Benign

0.0042

T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T

MetaSVM

Benign

-0.93

MutationAssessor

Benign

0.63

N;.;N;.;.;N;.;N;.;.;.;.

PrimateAI

Benign

0.25

PROVEAN

Benign

0.080

N;N;N;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.

REVEL

Benign

0.089

Sift

Benign

0.34

T;T;T;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.

Sift4G

Benign

0.79

T;T;T;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.

Polyphen

0.0010

B;.;B;.;.;B;.;B;.;.;.;.

Vest4

0.13

MVP

0.41

MPC

0.52

ClinPred

0.0020

GERP RS

1.3

RBP_binding_hub_radar

0.0

RBP_regulation_power_radar

1.1

Varity_R

0.027

gMVP

0.17

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over