rs11836060
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_001378609.3(OTOGL):c.5984G>A(p.Arg1995Gln) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.189 in 1,595,220 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 30,055 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 10/16 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001378609.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OTOGL | NM_001378609.3 | c.5984G>A | p.Arg1995Gln | missense_variant | Exon 49 of 59 | ENST00000547103.7 | NP_001365538.2 |
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.184 AC: 27972AN: 151668Hom.: 2730 Cov.: 31
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.174 AC: 41129AN: 236718Hom.: 3972 AF XY: 0.177 AC XY: 22731AN XY: 128616
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.190 AC: 274297AN: 1443436Hom.: 27324 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.191 AC XY: 136974AN XY: 717914
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.184 AC: 27974AN: 151784Hom.: 2731 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.181 AC XY: 13441AN XY: 74164
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:2
This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Arg1986Gln in exon 48 of OTOGL: This variant is not expected to have clinical si gnificance because it has been identified in 19.7% (1690/8600) of European Ameri can chromosomes from a broad population by the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (h ttp://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS; dbSNP rs11836060). -
not provided Benign:2
- -
- -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at