rs1183768

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1

The NM_015046.7(SETX):​c.3754G>A​(p.Gly1252Arg) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.791 in 1,613,874 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 520,850 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.68 ( 38858 hom., cov: 31)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.80 ( 481992 hom. )

Consequence

SETX
NM_015046.7 missense

Scores

1
17

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:20

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.508
Variant links:
Genes affected
SETX (HGNC:445): (senataxin) This gene encodes a protein named for its homology to the Sen1p protein of fungi which has RNA helicase activity encoded by a domain at the C-terminal end of the protein. The protein encoded by this gene contains a DNA/RNA helicase domain at its C-terminal end which suggests that it may be involved in both DNA and RNA processing. Mutations in this gene have been associated with ataxia-ocular apraxia-2 (AOA2) and an autosomal dominant form of juvenile amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS4). [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=8.695825E-7).
BP6
Variant 9-132327844-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr9-132327844-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 95662.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr9-132327844-C-T is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (NFE) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.838 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
SETXNM_015046.7 linkc.3754G>A p.Gly1252Arg missense_variant Exon 10 of 26 ENST00000224140.6 NP_055861.3 Q7Z333-1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
SETXENST00000224140.6 linkc.3754G>A p.Gly1252Arg missense_variant Exon 10 of 26 1 NM_015046.7 ENSP00000224140.5 Q7Z333-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.683
AC:
103831
AN:
151922
Hom.:
38853
Cov.:
31
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.385
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.860
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.787
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.734
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.323
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.620
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.832
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.685
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.844
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.728
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.734
AC:
184546
AN:
251284
Hom.:
71620
AF XY:
0.740
AC XY:
100434
AN XY:
135802
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.374
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.795
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.748
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.305
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.635
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.832
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.842
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.776
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.802
AC:
1172479
AN:
1461834
Hom.:
481992
Cov.:
70
AF XY:
0.798
AC XY:
580592
AN XY:
727216
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.368
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.794
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.747
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.287
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.637
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.831
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.850
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.756
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.683
AC:
103853
AN:
152040
Hom.:
38858
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.681
AC XY:
50590
AN XY:
74300
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.384
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.787
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.734
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.324
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.620
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.832
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.844
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.727
Alfa
AF:
0.800
Hom.:
127467
Bravo
AF:
0.665
TwinsUK
AF:
0.855
AC:
3172
ALSPAC
AF:
0.842
AC:
3244
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.397
AC:
1747
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.845
AC:
7267
ExAC
AF:
0.725
AC:
88015
Asia WGS
AF:
0.492
AC:
1713
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.840
EpiControl
AF:
0.834

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:20
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:11
-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-
Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen
Significance: Benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-
Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

Likely benign based on allele frequency in 1000 Genomes Project or ESP global frequency and its presence in a patient with a rare or unrelated disease phenotype. NOT Sanger confirmed. -

-
Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+
Significance: Benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center
Significance: Benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jul 24, 2013
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-
Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance: Benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht
Significance: Benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Mar 29, 2016
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

Variant identified in a genome or exome case(s) and assessed due to predicted null impact of the variant or pathogenic assertions in the literature or databases. Disclaimer: This variant has not undergone full assessment. The following are preliminary notes: Frequency, 2 labs classify as benign/LB in clinvar -

-
Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center
Significance: Benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Apr 29, 2015
GeneDx
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis type 4 Benign:3
May 28, 2019
Mendelics
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Jul 15, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:3
-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: not provided

- -

Nov 26, 2024
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Apr 12, 2017
Athena Diagnostics
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Spinocerebellar ataxia, autosomal recessive, with axonal neuropathy 2 Benign:2
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Jul 15, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Spinocerebellar ataxia, autosomal recessive, with axonal neuropathy 2;C1865409:Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis type 4 Benign:1
Feb 04, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.25
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.45
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.27
CADD
Benign
18
DANN
Benign
0.96
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.16
T
Eigen
Benign
-0.098
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.078
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.22
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.66
T
MetaRNN
Benign
8.7e-7
T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.93
T
MutationAssessor
Uncertain
2.1
M
PrimateAI
Benign
0.31
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-0.63
N
REVEL
Benign
0.24
Sift
Benign
0.13
T
Sift4G
Benign
0.46
T
Polyphen
0.48
P
Vest4
0.28
MutPred
0.14
Gain of helix (P = 0.0696);
MPC
0.099
ClinPred
0.020
T
GERP RS
4.7
Varity_R
0.072
gMVP
0.14

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs1183768; hg19: chr9-135203231; COSMIC: COSV56379133; API