rs11915053

chr3-132686337-T-C

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points: 0P and 14B. BP4_Strong BP6 BP7 BS1 BS2

The NM_153240.5(NPHP3):c.3252A>G(p.Thr1084=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00112 in 1,613,968 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 22 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

• Frequency:
  • Genomes: 𝑓 0.0058 (7 hom., cov: 33)
  • Exomes 𝑓: 0.00063 (15 hom.)
• Consequence: NPHP3 NM_153240.5 synonymous
• Clinical Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1 B:10
• Conservation: PhyloP100: -5.15

Genes affected

NPHP3 (HGNC:7907): (nephrocystin 3) This gene encodes a protein containing a coiled-coil (CC) domain, a tubulin-tyrosine ligase (TTL) domain, and a tetratrico peptide repeat (TPR) domain. The encoded protein interacts with nephrocystin, it is required for normal ciliary development, and it functions in renal tubular development. Mutations in this gene are associated with nephronophthisis type 3, and also with renal-hepatic-pancreatic dysplasia, and Meckel syndrome type 7. Naturally occurring read-through transcripts exist between this gene and the downstream ACAD11 (acyl-CoA dehydrogenase family, member 11) gene. [provided by RefSeq, Feb 2011]

NPHP3-ACAD11 (HGNC:):

ACMG classification

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points.

• BP4: Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.9).
• BP6: Variant 3-132686337-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr3-132686337-T-C is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 262704.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Benign=6, Uncertain_significance=1}. Variant chr3-132686337-T-C is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign]. Variant chr3-132686337-T-C is described in Lovd as [Benign].
• BP7: Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-5.15 with no splicing effect.
• BS1: Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.0058 (883/152306) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.0199 (829/41566). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0188. There are 7 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 423 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. This position pass quality control queck.
• BS2: High Homozygotes in GnomAd at 7 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	MANE	UniProt
NPHP3	NM_153240.5	c.3252A>G	p.Thr1084=	synonymous_variant	23/27	ENST00000337331.10
NPHP3-ACAD11	NR_037804.1	n.3258A>G		non_coding_transcript_exon_variant	22/45

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	TSL	MANE	Appris	UniProt
NPHP3	ENST00000337331.10	c.3252A>G	p.Thr1084=	synonymous_variant	23/27	1	NM_153240.5	P1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00580 AC: 883 AN: 152188 Hom.: 7 Cov.: 33

Gnomad AFR AF: 0.0200

Gnomad AMI AF: 0.00

Gnomad AMR AF: 0.00236

Gnomad ASJ AF: 0.00

Gnomad EAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad SAS AF: 0.000207

Gnomad FIN AF: 0.00

Gnomad MID AF: 0.00

Gnomad NFE AF: 0.0000882

Gnomad OTH AF: 0.00526

GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00154 AC: 388 AN: 251468 Hom.: 3 AF XY: 0.00100 AC XY: 136 AN XY: 135910

Gnomad AFR exome AF: 0.0209

Gnomad AMR exome AF: 0.000954

Gnomad ASJ exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad EAS exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad SAS exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad FIN exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad NFE exome AF: 0.0000879

Gnomad OTH exome AF: 0.000978

GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000629 AC: 920 AN: 1461662 Hom.: 15 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.000509 AC XY: 370 AN XY: 727142

Gnomad4 AFR exome AF: 0.0225

Gnomad4 AMR exome AF: 0.000939

Gnomad4 ASJ exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome AF: 0.0000232

Gnomad4 FIN exome AF: 0.0000187

Gnomad4 NFE exome AF: 0.0000342

Gnomad4 OTH exome AF: 0.00134

GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00580 AC: 883 AN: 152306 Hom.: 7 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00568 AC XY: 423 AN XY: 74478

Gnomad4 AFR AF: 0.0199

Gnomad4 AMR AF: 0.00235

Gnomad4 ASJ AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 EAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 SAS AF: 0.000207

Gnomad4 FIN AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 NFE AF: 0.0000882

Gnomad4 OTH AF: 0.00520

Alfa AF: 0.00314 Hom.: 0

Bravo AF: 0.00693

EpiCase AF: 0.000109

EpiControl AF: 0.0000593

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:1 Benign:10

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:5

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	GeneDx	Jan 18, 2018	This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago	Mar 08, 2018	- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences	-	- -
Benign, no assertion criteria provided	clinical testing	Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+	-	- -
Benign, no assertion criteria provided	clinical testing	Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center	-	- -

not provided Benign:2

Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided	clinical testing	Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht	-	- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided	clinical testing	Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center	-	- -

NPHP3-related Meckel-like syndrome Uncertain:1

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Jan 13, 2018

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Renal-hepatic-pancreatic dysplasia 1 Benign:1

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Jan 13, 2018

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Nephronophthisis Benign:1

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Invitae

Jan 18, 2024

- -

Nephronophthisis 3 Benign:1

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Jan 13, 2018

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
BayesDel_noAF	Benign	-0.90
Cadd	Benign	0.17
Dann	Benign	0.49

Splicing

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)		0.020		Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs11915053; hg19: chr3-132405181;