rs11948062

Positions:

chr5-177210568-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_022455.5(NSD1):c.2169C>T(p.Thr723=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000963 in 1,614,010 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 15 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0043 ( 3 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00062 ( 12 hom. )

Consequence

NSD1
NM_022455.5 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:8

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.0250

Variant links:

Genes affected

NSD1 (HGNC:14234): (nuclear receptor binding SET domain protein 1) This gene encodes a protein containing a SET domain, 2 LXXLL motifs, 3 nuclear translocation signals (NLSs), 4 plant homeodomain (PHD) finger regions, and a proline-rich region. The encoded protein enhances androgen receptor (AR) transactivation, and this enhancement can be increased further in the presence of other androgen receptor associated coregulators. This protein may act as a nucleus-localized, basic transcriptional factor and also as a bifunctional transcriptional regulator. Mutations of this gene have been associated with Sotos syndrome and Weaver syndrome. One version of childhood acute myeloid leukemia is the result of a cryptic translocation with the breakpoints occurring within nuclear receptor-binding Su-var, enhancer of zeste, and trithorax domain protein 1 on chromosome 5 and nucleoporin, 98-kd on chromosome 11. Multiple transcript variants encoding distinct isoforms have been identified for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Sep 2018]

NSD1 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.63).

BP6

Variant 5-177210568-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr5-177210568-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 159281.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr5-177210568-C-T is described in Lovd as [Benign].

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.025 with no splicing effect.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00428 (651/152140) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.0143 (595/41494). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0134. There are 3 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 302 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.

BS2

High AC in GnomAd4 at 651 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	MANE	UniProt
NSD1	NM_022455.5 linkuse as main transcript	c.2169C>T	p.Thr723=	synonymous_variant	5/23	ENST00000439151.7

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	TSL	MANE	Appris	UniProt
NSD1	ENST00000439151.7 linkuse as main transcript	c.2169C>T	p.Thr723=	synonymous_variant	5/23	1	NM_022455.5	P2	Q96L73-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00426

AC:

648

AN:

152022

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0143

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00216

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00173

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.000415

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00316

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.000147

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00192

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.00145

AC:

364

AN:

251418

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.00110

AC XY:

150

AN XY:

135892

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.0169

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00127

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00109

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.0000980

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.000220

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00114

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000618

AC:

903

AN:

1461870

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000520

AC XY:

378

AN XY:

727230

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.0168

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.00132

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00119

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.000128

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.0000908

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.00200

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00428

AC:

651

AN:

152140

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00406

AC XY:

302

AN XY:

74382

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.0143

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00216

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00173

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.000415

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.000147

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00190

Alfa

AF:

0.00204

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00478

Asia WGS

AF:

0.00115

AC:

AN:

3478

EpiCase

AF:

0.000218

EpiControl

AF:

0.000356

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:8

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Sotos syndrome

Benign:4

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Genome-Nilou Lab	Jul 15, 2021	- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics	Sep 27, 2021	- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories	Sep 18, 2023	- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Invitae	Oct 29, 2022	- -

not specified

Benign:2

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences	-	- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago	Feb 08, 2013	- -

Inborn genetic diseases

Benign:1

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Ambry Genetics

Aug 03, 2016

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

not provided

Benign:1

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

GeneDx

Mar 03, 2015

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.63

CADD

Benign

4.1

DANN

Benign

0.30

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over