rs1205684749
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -4 ACMG points: 0P and 4B. BS2
This summary comes from the ClinGen Evidence Repository: The CDH1 c.163+4_163+6dupAGG variant occurs in the splice donor region of intron 2. This allele is present at a frequency of 0.00001338 (2 in 149,510 alleles) in the gnomAD database (GRCh37) (http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org). This variant has been observed in more than ten individuals without DGC, SRC tumours or LBC and whose families do not suggest HDGC (BS2; SCV000969083.1, SCV000216473.4, SCV000637738.2). In summary, this variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP criteria applied as specified by the CDH1 Variant Curation Expert Panel (Variant Interpretation Guidelines Version 3.1): BS2. LINK:https://erepo.genome.network/evrepo/ui/classification/CA194099/MONDO:0007648/007
Frequency
Consequence
NM_004360.5 splice_region, intron
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -4 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CDH1 | NM_004360.5 | c.163+4_163+6dupAGG | splice_region_variant, intron_variant | Intron 2 of 15 | ENST00000261769.10 | NP_004351.1 | ||
CDH1 | NM_001317184.2 | c.163+4_163+6dupAGG | splice_region_variant, intron_variant | Intron 2 of 14 | NP_001304113.1 | |||
CDH1 | NM_001317185.2 | c.-1453+4_-1453+6dupAGG | splice_region_variant, intron_variant | Intron 2 of 15 | NP_001304114.1 | |||
CDH1 | NM_001317186.2 | c.-1657+4_-1657+6dupAGG | splice_region_variant, intron_variant | Intron 2 of 14 | NP_001304115.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CDH1 | ENST00000261769.10 | c.163+2_163+3insGAG | splice_region_variant, intron_variant | Intron 2 of 15 | 1 | NM_004360.5 | ENSP00000261769.4 | |||
CDH1 | ENST00000422392.6 | c.163+2_163+3insGAG | splice_region_variant, intron_variant | Intron 2 of 14 | 1 | ENSP00000414946.2 | ||||
CDH1 | ENST00000566612.5 | n.163+2_163+3insGAG | splice_region_variant, intron_variant | Intron 2 of 14 | 1 | ENSP00000454782.1 | ||||
CDH1 | ENST00000566510.5 | n.163+2_163+3insGAG | splice_region_variant, intron_variant | Intron 2 of 14 | 5 | ENSP00000458139.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00000659 AC: 1AN: 151804Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000134 AC: 2AN: 149510Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000126 AC XY: 1AN XY: 79410
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000506 AC: 7AN: 1384118Hom.: 0 Cov.: 28 AF XY: 0.00000440 AC XY: 3AN XY: 681940
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00000658 AC: 1AN: 151922Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 74282
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Hereditary diffuse gastric adenocarcinoma Benign:3
- -
- -
This variant is considered likely benign. This variant is intronic and is not expected to impact mRNA splicing. -
not provided Benign:2
- -
- -
not specified Benign:1
- -
CDH1-related diffuse gastric and lobular breast cancer syndrome Benign:1
The CDH1 c.163+4_163+6dupAGG variant occurs in the splice donor region of intron 2. This allele is present at a frequency of 0.00001338 (2 in 149,510 alleles) in the gnomAD database (GRCh37) (http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org). This variant has been observed in more than ten individuals without DGC, SRC tumours or LBC and whose families do not suggest HDGC (BS2; SCV000969083.1, SCV000216473.4, SCV000637738.2). In summary, this variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP criteria applied as specified by the CDH1 Variant Curation Expert Panel (Variant Interpretation Guidelines Version 3.1): BS2. -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:1
This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at