rs1210700121
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. Variant got 1 ACMG points: 2P and 1B. PM2BP6
The NM_000546.6(TP53):c.275C>T(p.Pro92Leu) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000000685 in 1,460,596 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000546.6 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Uncertain_significance. Variant got 1 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00000399 AC: 1AN: 250424Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.00000737 AC XY: 1AN XY: 135712
GnomAD4 exome AF: 6.85e-7 AC: 1AN: 1460596Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 726570
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:2Benign:2
This missense variant replaces proline with leucine at codon 92 of the TP53 protein. Computational prediction suggests that this variant may not impact protein structure and function (internally defined REVEL score threshold <= 0.5, PMID: 27666373). Experimental studies have shown that this variant did not impact function in yeast transactivation assays (PMID: 12826609) and human cell growth suppression assays (PMID: 30224644). To our knowledge, this variant has not been reported as a germline mutation in individuals affected with TP53-related disorders in the literature. This variant has been identified in 1/250424 chromosomes in the general population by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). The available evidence is insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease conclusively. Therefore, this variant is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -
- -
This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Each variant was annotated with functional scores from MAVE data which was translated into functional evidence codes. All other evidence codes and combining criteria were adhered to as closely as possible based on the ClinGen VCEP (Variant Curation Expert Panel) gene-specific recommendations. See Supplemental Figure 34 of final paper (Supp Fig. 28 in preprint: doi:10.1101/2024.04.11.24305690) for a table to see which lines of evidence we did not have data for. The ClinGen VCEPs are highly regarded as the gold-standard for gene-specific variant curation and are developed after extensive evaluation of the evidence by clinical and scientific experts for the particular gene to classify genomic variants on a spectrum from pathogenic to benign using the 2015 ACMG/AMP Variant Interpretation Guidelines as a backbone (PMID: 25741868). Reclassification of these VUS variants from gnomAD or All of Us focused only on variants originally prescribed as VUS in ClinVar. To ensure reproducibility, transparency, and increased throughput, all the procedures for annotating variants and assigning evidence codes were codified using Python. All code has been made freely available and is linked in the Code Availability section and all reclassified variants with evidence codes used can be found in Tables S18-19 (preprint: doi:10.1101/2024.04.11.24305690). For the MAVE data, the clinical curation and clinical strength assignment as per the ClinGen recommendations in Brnich et al. (2020) (PMID: 31892348) for or against pathogenicity or benignity of each of these MAVE datasets utilized in this study were previously published in Fayer et al. (2021) (PMID: 34793697).For TP53, we used the output of the Naïve Bayes classifier that synthesized data from four different TP53 MAVEs in Fayer et al. (2021) (PMID: 34793697). If the classifier predicted a variant to be "Functionally abnormal," the variant was assigned PS3 evidence and no BS3 evidence. If a variant was predicted to be "Functionally normal," BS3_moderate evidence was used with no PS3 evidence. This variant GRCh38:17:7676094:G>A was assigned evidence codes ['BS3_Moderate', 'BP4'] and an overall classification of Likely benign -
Li-Fraumeni syndrome Uncertain:2
This missense variant replaces proline with leucine at codon 92 of the TP53 protein. Computational prediction suggests that this variant may not impact protein structure and function (internally defined REVEL score threshold <= 0.5, PMID: 27666373). Experimental studies have shown that this variant did not impact function in yeast transactivation assays (PMID: 12826609) and human cell growth suppression assays (PMID: 30224644). To our knowledge, this variant has not been reported as a germline mutation in individuals affected with TP53-related disorders in the literature. This variant has been identified in 1/250424 chromosomes in the general population by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). The available evidence is insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease conclusively. Therefore, this variant is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -
This sequence change replaces proline, which is neutral and non-polar, with leucine, which is neutral and non-polar, at codon 92 of the TP53 protein (p.Pro92Leu). The frequency data for this variant in the population databases is considered unreliable, as metrics indicate poor data quality at this position in the gnomAD database. This missense change has been observed in individual(s) with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (PMID: 28255015). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 480733). Invitae Evidence Modeling incorporating data from in vitro experimental studies (PMID: 12826609, 29979965, 30224644) indicates that this missense variant is not expected to disrupt TP53 function with a negative predictive value of 97.5%. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -
Li-Fraumeni syndrome 1 Uncertain:1
- -
Familial cancer of breast;C1835398:Li-Fraumeni syndrome 1 Uncertain:1
- -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at