rs12126088

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_172351.3(CD46):​c.417A>G​(p.Leu139Leu) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00718 in 1,595,512 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 51 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0057 ( 3 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0073 ( 48 hom. )

Consequence

CD46
NM_172351.3 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:9

Conservation

PhyloP100: -2.17

Publications

6 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
CD46 (HGNC:6953): (CD46 molecule) The protein encoded by this gene is a type I membrane protein and is a regulatory part of the complement system. The encoded protein has cofactor activity for inactivation of complement components C3b and C4b by serum factor I, which protects the host cell from damage by complement. In addition, the encoded protein can act as a receptor for the Edmonston strain of measles virus, human herpesvirus-6, and type IV pili of pathogenic Neisseria. Finally, the protein encoded by this gene may be involved in the fusion of the spermatozoa with the oocyte during fertilization. Mutations at this locus have been associated with susceptibility to hemolytic uremic syndrome. Alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been described. [provided by RefSeq, Jun 2010]
CD46 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • atypical hemolytic-uremic syndrome with MCP/CD46 anomaly
    Inheritance: AD, AR, SD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Ambry Genetics

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.86).
BP6
Variant 1-207759666-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr1-207759666-A-G is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 522216.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-2.17 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00574 (875/152346) while in subpopulation NFE AF = 0.00853 (580/68030). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00795. There are 3 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 429 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 3 AD,AR,SD gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
CD46NM_172351.3 linkc.417A>G p.Leu139Leu synonymous_variant Exon 4 of 13 ENST00000367042.6 NP_758861.1 P15529-11

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
CD46ENST00000367042.6 linkc.417A>G p.Leu139Leu synonymous_variant Exon 4 of 13 1 NM_172351.3 ENSP00000356009.1 P15529-11

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00575
AC:
875
AN:
152228
Hom.:
3
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00121
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00543
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.0225
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.000192
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00145
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00612
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.0127
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00852
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00334
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.00666
AC:
1663
AN:
249636
AF XY:
0.00679
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00107
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00395
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.0184
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.000109
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00574
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00960
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00905
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00733
AC:
10576
AN:
1443166
Hom.:
48
Cov.:
26
AF XY:
0.00725
AC XY:
5210
AN XY:
719014
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000785
AC:
26
AN:
33132
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00401
AC:
179
AN:
44636
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0176
AC:
457
AN:
25978
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.000101
AC:
4
AN:
39506
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00199
AC:
171
AN:
85734
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00658
AC:
351
AN:
53360
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00575
AC:
33
AN:
5740
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00816
AC:
8943
AN:
1095318
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00689
AC:
412
AN:
59762
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.470
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
443
886
1328
1771
2214
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
330
660
990
1320
1650
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00574
AC:
875
AN:
152346
Hom.:
3
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.00576
AC XY:
429
AN XY:
74500
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00120
AC:
50
AN:
41576
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00542
AC:
83
AN:
15300
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0225
AC:
78
AN:
3472
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.000193
AC:
1
AN:
5192
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00166
AC:
8
AN:
4830
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00612
AC:
65
AN:
10624
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.0102
AC:
3
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00853
AC:
580
AN:
68030
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00331
AC:
7
AN:
2116
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.498
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
42
84
127
169
211
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
20
40
60
80
100
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.00862
Hom.:
3
Bravo
AF:
0.00542
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00260
AC:
9
AN:
3476
EpiCase
AF:
0.00960
EpiControl
AF:
0.0104

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:9
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Atypical hemolytic-uremic syndrome with MCP/CD46 anomaly Benign:3
Jun 28, 2017
Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Jul 22, 2015
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:3
Feb 02, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Apr 01, 2025
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

CD46: BP4, BP7, BS2 -

-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

not specified Benign:2
Jul 08, 2021
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Kidney disorder Benign:1
Nov 10, 2020
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, The Hospital for Sick Children
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.86
CADD
Benign
0.35
DANN
Benign
0.64
PhyloP100
-2.2
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.1
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.020
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs12126088; hg19: chr1-207933011; API