rs121434571
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely pathogenic. The variant received 6 ACMG points: 6P and 0B. PM2PM5PP3_Moderate
The NM_000123.4(ERCC5):c.2375C>A(p.Ala792Glu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000124 in 1,614,046 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar. Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. A792V) has been classified as Likely pathogenic.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000123.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_pathogenic. The variant received 6 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ERCC5 | ENST00000652225.2 | c.2375C>A | p.Ala792Glu | missense_variant | Exon 11 of 15 | NM_000123.4 | ENSP00000498881.2 | |||
| BIVM-ERCC5 | ENST00000639435.1 | c.3737C>A | p.Ala1246Glu | missense_variant | Exon 21 of 25 | 5 | ENSP00000491742.1 | |||
| BIVM-ERCC5 | ENST00000639132.1 | c.3050C>A | p.Ala1017Glu | missense_variant | Exon 20 of 24 | 5 | ENSP00000492684.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00000657 AC: 1AN: 152240Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.00000398 AC: 1AN: 251294 AF XY: 0.00 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 6.84e-7 AC: 1AN: 1461806Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 727210 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00000657 AC: 1AN: 152240Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 74388 show subpopulations ⚠️ The allele balance in gnomAD version 4 Genomes is significantly skewed from the expected value of 0.5.
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at