Menu
GeneBe

rs121908790

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BP4_StrongBP6BS2

The NM_000492.4(CFTR):c.164+12T>C variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00024 in 1,260,782 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 5 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00011 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00026 ( 5 hom. )

Consequence

CFTR
NM_000492.4 intron

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:5B:5O:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.181
Variant links:
Genes affected
CFTR (HGNC:1884): (CF transmembrane conductance regulator) This gene encodes a member of the ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporter superfamily. The encoded protein functions as a chloride channel, making it unique among members of this protein family, and controls ion and water secretion and absorption in epithelial tissues. Channel activation is mediated by cycles of regulatory domain phosphorylation, ATP-binding by the nucleotide-binding domains, and ATP hydrolysis. Mutations in this gene cause cystic fibrosis, the most common lethal genetic disorder in populations of Northern European descent. The most frequently occurring mutation in cystic fibrosis, DeltaF508, results in impaired folding and trafficking of the encoded protein. Multiple pseudogenes have been identified in the human genome. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2017]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.89).
BP6
Variant 7-117504375-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr7-117504375-T-C is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 53302.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Uncertain_significance=5, Likely_benign=3, not_provided=1, Benign=1}.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome at 2 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
CFTRNM_000492.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.164+12T>C intron_variant ENST00000003084.11

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
CFTRENST00000003084.11 linkuse as main transcriptc.164+12T>C intron_variant 1 NM_000492.4 P2P13569-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000112
AC:
17
AN:
152222
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0000241
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00311
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000147
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000343
AC:
85
AN:
247964
Hom.:
2
AF XY:
0.000485
AC XY:
65
AN XY:
134022
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00260
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000269
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000497
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000258
AC:
286
AN:
1108442
Hom.:
5
Cov.:
16
AF XY:
0.000355
AC XY:
202
AN XY:
568722
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.0000264
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00316
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0000304
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000206
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000112
AC:
17
AN:
152340
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000148
AC XY:
11
AN XY:
74486
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0000240
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00311
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0000147
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Alfa
AF:
0.0000782
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.0000453
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000866
AC:
3
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:5Benign:5Other:1
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Cystic fibrosis Uncertain:3Benign:3Other:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome-Nilou LabJul 22, 2021- -
not provided, no classification providedliterature onlyClinVar Staff, National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI)-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeJan 25, 2024- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submittercurationInstitute of Human Genetics, University of Leipzig Medical CenterSep 05, 2022This variant was identified in 1 patient with a clinically confirmed diagnosis of cystic fibrosis. The variant was classified in the context of a project re-classifying variants in the German Cystic Fibrosis Registry (Muko.e.V.). Link: https://www.muko.info/angebote/qualitaetsmanagement/register/cf-einrichtungen/mukoweb. Criteria applied: PM3, PP4, BS2, BP2, BP4 -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaNov 21, 2017The CFTR c.164+12T>C variant, which is often referred to as c.296+12T>C, has been reported in at least three studies and is found in a homozygous state in four individuals, three of whom were diagnosed with cystic fibrosis (CF) (Malone et al. 1998; Trujillano et al. 2015; Banjar et al. 2017). In a 6-year-old girl of Saudi descent, the c.164+12T>C variant was identified with a frameshift variant in a double homozygous state. The girl was reported to exhibit an earlier age of onset and lower BMI compared with other affected individuals (Banjar et al. 2017). The variant was shown to segregate with the disease in two families. The c.164+12T>C variant was absent from controls but is reported in a homozygous state in Exome Aggregation Consortium and Genome Aggregation Database. This variant is reported at a frequency of 0.019417 in the Gujarati Indian in Houston, Texas population of the 1000 Genomes Project, which is high but could be consistent with disease under-diagnosis in non-Caucasian populations. The evidence for this variant is limited. The c.164+12T>C variant is classified as unknown significance but suspicious for pathogenicity for CFTR-related disorders. This variant was observed by ICSL as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingNatera, Inc.Jan 03, 2020- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsJun 28, 2023This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
not provided Uncertain:1Benign:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEurofins Ntd Llc (ga)Apr 10, 2017- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP LaboratoriesFeb 24, 2023- -
CFTR-related condition Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact SciencesFeb 22, 2024The CFTR c.164+12T>C variant is predicted to interfere with splicing. This variant has been previously reported in homozygous state in individuals with cystic fibrosis (see for example: Trujillano et al. 2015. PubMed ID: 26436105 and Banjar et al. 2017. PubMed ID: 30805499). In one individual this variant was described as double homozygous, along with a second homozygous CFTR pathogenic variant (Banjar et al. 2017. PubMed ID: 30805499; ClinVarID:53841). This variant is reported in 0.26% of alleles in individuals of South Asian descent in gnomAD. At this time, the clinical significance of this variant is uncertain due to the absence of conclusive functional and genetic evidence. -
not specified Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpJul 13, 2022Variant summary: CFTR c.164+12T>C alters a non-conserved nucleotide located close to a canonical splice site and therefore could affect mRNA splicing, leading to a significantly altered protein sequence. 4/4 computational tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. However, these predictions have yet to be confirmed by functional studies. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00034 in 247964 control chromosomes, predominantly at a frequency of 0.0026 within the South Asian subpopulation in the gnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. This frequency is not higher than expected for a pathogenic variant in CFTR causing Cystic Fibrosis (0.0026 vs 0.013), allowing no conclusion about variant significance. c.164+12T>C was reported in the homozygous state in two unrelated Cystic Fibrosis patients of Pakistani origin born to consanguineous parents (Malone_1998). However, due to the use of older mutational scanning technologies in this study, the possibility of missed co-occurrences with pathogenic variants in these patients cannot be ruled out. A more recent study reported the variant in one patient of Saudi Arabian descent with classic CF in homozygous state. However, the patient was also homozygous for another pathogenic CFTR variant (c.3889dupT, p.Ser1297PhefsX5) present in cis with the variant of interest (Banjar_2017), providing supporting evidence for a benign role. Another recent study (Lascano-Vaca_2020), reported the variant in heterozygous state in 2 pediatric CF patients from Ecuador with a detailed genotype provided for one of the patients who also had known pathogenic variants F508del and W1098X, providing further supporting evidence for a benign role. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. Two ClinVar submitters (evaluation after 2014) cite the variant as benign/likely benign and three ClinVar submitters (evaluation after 2014) cite it as uncertain significance. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as likely benign. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.89
Cadd
Benign
0.18
Dann
Benign
0.63

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs121908790; hg19: chr7-117144429; API