rs121909339
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Pathogenic. Variant got 18 ACMG points: 18P and 0B. PVS1PM2PP5_Very_Strong
The NM_001453.3(FOXC1):c.358C>T(p.Gln120Ter) variant causes a stop gained change. The variant was absent in control chromosomes in GnomAD project. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Pathogenic (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: not found (cov: 31)
Consequence
FOXC1
NM_001453.3 stop_gained
NM_001453.3 stop_gained
Scores
4
2
1
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 5.27
Genes affected
FOXC1 (HGNC:3800): (forkhead box C1) This gene belongs to the forkhead family of transcription factors which is characterized by a distinct DNA-binding forkhead domain. The specific function of this gene has not yet been determined; however, it has been shown to play a role in the regulation of embryonic and ocular development. Mutations in this gene cause various glaucoma phenotypes including primary congenital glaucoma, autosomal dominant iridogoniodysgenesis anomaly, and Axenfeld-Rieger anomaly. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Pathogenic. Variant got 18 ACMG points.
PVS1
Loss of function variant, product does not undergo nonsense mediated mRNA decay. Variant is located in the 3'-most exon, not predicted to undergo nonsense mediated mRNA decay. There are 24 pathogenic variants in the truncated region.
PM2
Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;
PP5
Variant 6-1610803-C-T is Pathogenic according to our data. Variant chr6-1610803-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Pathogenic]. Clinvar id is 8461.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FOXC1 | NM_001453.3 | c.358C>T | p.Gln120Ter | stop_gained | 1/1 | ENST00000645831.2 | NP_001444.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FOXC1 | ENST00000645831.2 | c.358C>T | p.Gln120Ter | stop_gained | 1/1 | NM_001453.3 | ENSP00000493906 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 31
GnomAD3 genomes
Cov.:
31
GnomAD4 exome Cov.: 32
GnomAD4 exome
Cov.:
32
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 31
GnomAD4 genome
Cov.:
31
ClinVar
Significance: Pathogenic
Submissions summary: Pathogenic:3
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
Axenfeld-Rieger syndrome type 3 Pathogenic:3
Pathogenic, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | 3billion | Jan 03, 2022 | Stop-gained (nonsense): predicted to result in a loss or disruption of normal protein function through protein truncation. The predicted truncated protein may be shortened by more than 10% (PVS1_S). The variant was co-segregated with Axenfeld-Rieger syndrome, type 3 in multiple affected family members with additional meioses meeting moderate evidence levels (PMID: 18498376, PP1_M). The variant has been reported at least twice as pathogenic/likely pathogenic with clinical assertions and evidence for the classification (ClinVar ID: VCV000008461, PMID:18498376). It is not observed in the gnomAD v2.1.1 dataset (PM2_M). Therefore, this variant is classified as pathogenic according to the recommendation of ACMG/AMP guideline. - |
Pathogenic, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Aug 12, 2021 | - - |
Pathogenic, no assertion criteria provided | literature only | OMIM | Nov 01, 2008 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_addAF
Pathogenic
D
BayesDel_noAF
Pathogenic
CADD
Pathogenic
DANN
Uncertain
Eigen
Pathogenic
Eigen_PC
Pathogenic
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
D
MutationTaster
Benign
A
Vest4
GERP RS
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at