rs121912486
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. Variant got 0 ACMG points: 2P and 2B. PM2BP4_Moderate
The NM_000228.3(LAMB3):āc.596G>Cā(p.Gly199Ala) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000000685 in 1,460,532 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 16/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (ā ).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000228.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Uncertain_significance. Variant got 0 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LAMB3 | NM_000228.3 | c.596G>C | p.Gly199Ala | missense_variant | 7/23 | ENST00000356082.9 | NP_000219.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LAMB3 | ENST00000356082.9 | c.596G>C | p.Gly199Ala | missense_variant | 7/23 | 1 | NM_000228.3 | ENSP00000348384 | P1 | |
LAMB3 | ENST00000367030.7 | c.596G>C | p.Gly199Ala | missense_variant | 7/23 | 1 | ENSP00000355997 | P1 | ||
LAMB3 | ENST00000391911.5 | c.596G>C | p.Gly199Ala | missense_variant | 6/22 | 1 | ENSP00000375778 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 33
GnomAD4 exome AF: 6.85e-7 AC: 1AN: 1460532Hom.: 0 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.00000138 AC XY: 1AN XY: 726724
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 33
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Junctional epidermolysis bullosa, non-Herlitz type Pathogenic:1
Pathogenic, no assertion criteria provided | literature only | OMIM | May 01, 2007 | - - |
Junctional epidermolysis bullosa gravis of Herlitz Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Counsyl | Jun 07, 2017 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at