rs121912525
Variant summary
Our verdict is Pathogenic. Variant got 14 ACMG points: 14P and 0B. PM2PP3_StrongPP5_Very_Strong
The NM_000233.4(LHCGR):c.1847C>A(p.Ser616Tyr) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000118 in 1,614,136 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely pathogenic (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000233.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Pathogenic. Variant got 14 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LHCGR | ENST00000294954.12 | c.1847C>A | p.Ser616Tyr | missense_variant | Exon 11 of 11 | 1 | NM_000233.4 | ENSP00000294954.6 | ||
ENSG00000279956 | ENST00000602369.3 | n.*220+6274C>A | intron_variant | Intron 9 of 12 | 5 | ENSP00000473498.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000526 AC: 8AN: 152192Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000199 AC: 5AN: 250950Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000147 AC XY: 2AN XY: 135748
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000752 AC: 11AN: 1461826Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00000550 AC XY: 4AN XY: 727218
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000525 AC: 8AN: 152310Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000537 AC XY: 4AN XY: 74482
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Leydig cell agenesis Pathogenic:2
Variant summary: LHCGR c.1847C>A (p.Ser616Tyr) results in a non-conservative amino acid change located in the GPCR, rhodopsin-like, 7TM domain (IPR017452) of the encoded protein sequence. Five of five in-silico tools predict a damaging effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 2e-05 in 250950 control chromosomes. c.1847C>A has been reported in the literature as a biallelic compound heterozygous or homozygous genotype in individuals affected with features of Leydig Cell Hypoplasia (example, Yan_2019, Newton_216, Vezzoli_2015). These data indicate that the variant is likely to be associated with disease. At least one publication reports experimental evidence evaluating an impact on protein function. The most pronounced variant effect results in severe intracellular retention and decreased hormone binding to the mutant receptor in-vitro (Newton_2016). The following publications have been ascertained in the context of this evaluation (PMID: 8559204, 8843415, 17030087, 9039330, 16123233, 16616374, 27533885, 26246498, 30444213). Two submitters have cited clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014. All submitters classified the variant as pathogenic/likely pathogenic. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as pathogenic. -
ACMG classification criteria: PS3 supporting, PS4 moderated, PM2 moderated, PM3 supporting, PP3 supporting -
Leydig hypoplasia, type I Pathogenic:1
- -
not provided Pathogenic:1
This sequence change replaces serine, which is neutral and polar, with tyrosine, which is neutral and polar, at codon 616 of the LHCGR protein (p.Ser616Tyr). This variant is present in population databases (rs121912525, gnomAD 0.009%). This missense change has been observed in individuals with clinical features of autosomal recessive LHCGR-related conditions (PMID: 26246498, 27016457; internal data). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 14393). Invitae Evidence Modeling of protein sequence and biophysical properties (such as structural, functional, and spatial information, amino acid conservation, physicochemical variation, residue mobility, and thermodynamic stability) indicates that this missense variant is expected to disrupt LHCGR protein function with a positive predictive value of 80%. Experimental studies have shown that this missense change affects LHCGR function (PMID: 8559204, 11041448, 27533885). For these reasons, this variant has been classified as Pathogenic. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at