rs121912998

Positions:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -12 ACMG points: 0P and 12B. BP4_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_004415.4(DSP):​c.88G>A​(p.Val30Met) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00134 in 1,595,514 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 5 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. V30V) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0011 ( 1 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0014 ( 4 hom. )

Consequence

DSP
NM_004415.4 missense

Scores

3
16

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications P:3U:5B:22

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.807
Variant links:
Genes affected
DSP (HGNC:3052): (desmoplakin) This gene encodes a protein that anchors intermediate filaments to desmosomal plaques and forms an obligate component of functional desmosomes. Mutations in this gene are the cause of several cardiomyopathies and keratodermas, including skin fragility-woolly hair syndrome. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Jan 2016]
DSP-AS1 (HGNC:56039): (DSP antisense RNA 1)

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -12 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.03806615).
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population mid. gnomad4_exome allele frequency = 0.00136 (1956/1443186) while in subpopulation MID AF= 0.00835 (48/5746). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00647. There are 4 homozygotes in gnomad4_exome. There are 1110 alleles in male gnomad4_exome subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 4 AD,AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
DSPNM_004415.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.88G>A p.Val30Met missense_variant 1/24 ENST00000379802.8 NP_004406.2
DSP-AS1NR_183331.1 linkuse as main transcriptn.39-950C>T intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
DSPENST00000379802.8 linkuse as main transcriptc.88G>A p.Val30Met missense_variant 1/241 NM_004415.4 ENSP00000369129 P2P15924-1
DSP-AS1ENST00000690863.2 linkuse as main transcriptn.344+768C>T intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00116
AC:
176
AN:
152210
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0000965
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00216
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.000288
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.000193
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00579
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00633
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00154
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000956
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00159
AC:
331
AN:
208172
Hom.:
3
AF XY:
0.00190
AC XY:
216
AN XY:
113510
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000248
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000990
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.000550
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00433
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.000164
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00185
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00154
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00136
AC:
1956
AN:
1443186
Hom.:
4
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00155
AC XY:
1110
AN XY:
716308
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.000182
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000945
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.000350
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00416
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.000178
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00128
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00136
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00115
AC:
175
AN:
152328
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.00138
AC XY:
103
AN XY:
74494
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0000962
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00216
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.000288
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.000193
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00580
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00154
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.000946
Alfa
AF:
0.00192
Hom.:
2
Bravo
AF:
0.00123
TwinsUK
AF:
0.000539
AC:
2
ALSPAC
AF:
0.000259
AC:
1
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.00187
AC:
16
ExAC
AF:
0.00161
AC:
193
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00231
AC:
8
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Pathogenic:3Uncertain:5Benign:22
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Uncertain:1Benign:5
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpOct 11, 2021Variant summary: DSP c.88G>A (p.Val30Met) results in a conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Four of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0016 in 212604 control chromosomes, predominantly at a frequency of 0.0043 within the South Asian subpopulation in the gnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. The observed variant frequency within South Asian control individuals in the gnomAD database is approximately 22 fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in DSP causing Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Dysplasia/Cardiomyopathy phenotype (0.0002), strongly suggesting that the variant is a benign polymorphism found primarily in populations of South Asian origin. c.88G>A has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Dysplasia/Cardiomyopathy (e.g. Yang_2006, Bauce_2010, Xu_2010, Rasmussen_2013, Rasmussen_2013, Bhonsale_2013, Rigato_2013). These data do not allow any conclusion about variant significance. At least one publication reports experimental evidence evaluating an impact on protein function. These results showed no damaging effect of this variant (Rasmussen_2012). Fourteen clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation. Multiple laboratories reported the variant with conflicting assessments (Benign/likely benign n=9, VUS n=3). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as benign. -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingJoint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+-- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLaboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized MedicineApr 03, 2015p.Val30Met in exon 1 of DSP: This variant is not expected to have clinical signi ficance due to a lack of conservation across species, including mammals. Of note , multiple mammals, including several primates, have a methionine (Met) at this position. This strongly argues against a disease causing role, though a modifyin g effect cannot be excluded. In addition, it has been identified in 0.6% (57/99 98) of South Asian chromosomes by the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC, http:/ /exac.broadinstitute.org; dbSNP rs12192998). Of note, this variant has been publ ished by several studies (http://arvcdatabase.info/), though the data provided b y these studies is uninformative. -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center-- -
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingStanford Center for Inherited Cardiovascular Disease, Stanford UniversityFeb 06, 2014Note this variant was found in clinical genetic testing performed by one or more labs who may also submit to ClinVar. Thus any internal case data may overlap with the internal case data of other labs. The interpretation reviewed below is that of the Stanford Center for Inherited Cardiovascular Disease. Based on the data reviewed below, we consider this a variant of uncertain significance. This variant has been identified in multiple probands with ARVC and in one SCICD center patient with conduction system disease, biventricular dysfunction and a history of SCD. Yang et al (2006) first reported the variant in an individual with ARVC in a publication that only reports on DSP variants. In all other published cases this variant occurs with additional variants. Bauce et al (2010) identified an individual with ARVC and two DSP variants, p.Val30Met and p.Arg2541Lys. Each variant was detected in isolation in separate affected family members. Xu et al (2010) report a proband with the p.Val30Met variant as well as a nonsense and a missense variant in the PKP2 gene. This is a conservative amino acid change with the replacement on a nonpolar Valine with a nonpolar Methionine. Valine is not conserved across species and several species harbor a Methionine at this codon. In vitro studies reported by Yang et al (2006) showed that when this variant is present desmoplakin is trapped in the cytoplasm and fails to localize to the cell membrane. In total the variant has been seen in 21 of 9109 published controls and publicly available general population samples (as of 12/6/14). Across available publications the variant is absent in 1150 presumably healthy control individuals. However, more recently Kapplinger et al (2011) reported the variant in 1 of 427 presumably healthy individuals and the variant is reported in 16 of 4,269 European individuals in the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project dataset and 0 of 2169 African American individuals (as of 2/6/14). It is also reported in dbSNP (rs 121912998), though this seems to point to the NHLBI data. It was also seen in 4 of 1094 individuals in the 1000 genomes low coverage data. -
not provided Uncertain:1Benign:5
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEurofins Ntd Llc (ga)Mar 24, 2015- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCeGaT Center for Human Genetics TuebingenMay 01, 2024DSP: BS2 -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDiagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen-- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center-- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingLaboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)-- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxAug 20, 2020This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 32268277, 31028938, 25637381, 16917092, 20152563, 21636032, 23137101, 23671136, 24070718, 20129281, 23861362, 26656175, 27153395, 26332594, 26569459, 23299917, 28473349, 25985138, 27435932, 28798025, 31019283, 31402444, 33232181) -
Arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia 8 Uncertain:2Benign:2
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedliterature onlyOMIMSep 15, 2006- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEquipe Genetique des Anomalies du Developpement, Université de BourgogneNov 21, 2018- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaMar 06, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInstitute of Human Genetics, University of Leipzig Medical CenterJan 01, 2019- -
Cardiomyopathy Pathogenic:1Benign:2
Pathogenic, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingForensic Genetics Laboratory, Harris County Institute of Forensic SciencesMar 27, 2015- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingColor Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color HealthMar 14, 2018- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern OntarioJul 27, 2018- -
Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy Uncertain:1Benign:2
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedresearchCSER _CC_NCGL, University of WashingtonJun 01, 2014- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenomic Diagnostic Laboratory, Division of Genomic Diagnostics, Children's Hospital of PhiladelphiaJun 25, 2015- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterresearchBiesecker Lab/Clinical Genomics Section, National Institutes of HealthJun 24, 2013- -
Right ventricular cardiomyopathy Pathogenic:1
Likely pathogenic, flagged submissionclinical testingCentre for Mendelian Genomics, University Medical Centre LjubljanaDec 13, 2013- -
Keratosis palmoplantaris striata 2 Pathogenic:1
Likely pathogenic, flagged submissionclinical testingCentre for Mendelian Genomics, University Medical Centre LjubljanaJan 01, 2016This variant was classified as: Likely pathogenic. -
Arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy with wooly hair and keratoderma Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAll of Us Research Program, National Institutes of HealthFeb 05, 2024- -
Arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia 8;C1854063:Arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy with wooly hair and keratoderma Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpJan 31, 2024- -
Lethal acantholytic epidermolysis bullosa Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaMar 06, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -
Woolly hair-skin fragility syndrome Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaMar 06, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsOct 30, 2018This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
DSP-related disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact SciencesSep 12, 2022This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.066
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.33
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.24
CADD
Benign
0.014
DANN
Benign
0.93
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.14
T;.
Eigen
Benign
-2.2
Eigen_PC
Benign
-2.3
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.0053
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.59
T;T
M_CAP
Uncertain
0.23
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.038
T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-1.1
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
-0.69
N;N
MutationTaster
Benign
2.5e-7
A;A
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.63
T
PROVEAN
Benign
0.40
N;N
REVEL
Uncertain
0.39
Sift
Benign
1.0
T;T
Sift4G
Benign
1.0
T;T
Polyphen
0.0
B;.
Vest4
0.13
MVP
0.99
MPC
0.22
ClinPred
0.0093
T
GERP RS
-7.3
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.1
Varity_R
0.034
gMVP
0.20

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs121912998; hg19: chr6-7542236; API