rs121913371
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. Variant got 4 ACMG points: 4P and 0B. PM2PP2PP3
The NM_004333.6(BRAF):c.1330C>T(p.Arg444Trp) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000000684 in 1,461,576 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar. Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. R444R) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_004333.6 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Uncertain_significance. Variant got 4 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRAF | NM_001374258.1 | c.1450C>T | p.Arg484Trp | missense_variant | 12/20 | ENST00000644969.2 | NP_001361187.1 | |
BRAF | NM_004333.6 | c.1330C>T | p.Arg444Trp | missense_variant | 11/18 | ENST00000646891.2 | NP_004324.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRAF | ENST00000644969.2 | c.1450C>T | p.Arg484Trp | missense_variant | 12/20 | NM_001374258.1 | ENSP00000496776.1 | |||
BRAF | ENST00000646891.2 | c.1330C>T | p.Arg444Trp | missense_variant | 11/18 | NM_004333.6 | ENSP00000493543.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00000398 AC: 1AN: 251378Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 135856
GnomAD4 exome AF: 6.84e-7 AC: 1AN: 1461576Hom.: 0 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 727110
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Melanoma Pathogenic:1
Likely pathogenic, no assertion criteria provided | literature only | Database of Curated Mutations (DoCM) | Jul 14, 2015 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at