rs121913386
Variant summary
Our verdict is Pathogenic. The variant received 11 ACMG points: 11P and 0B. PM1PM2PM5PP3_StrongPP5
The NM_000077.5(CDKN2A):c.341C>T(p.Pro114Leu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant was absent in control chromosomes in GnomAD project. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. 12/21 in silico tools predict a damaging outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. P114S) has been classified as Likely pathogenic.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000077.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- melanoma, cutaneous malignant, susceptibility to, 2Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: G2P
- melanoma-pancreatic cancer syndromeInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp, ClinGen, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics
- familial atypical multiple mole melanoma syndromeInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- melanoma and neural system tumor syndromeInheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Pathogenic. The variant received 11 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_000077.5. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
| Selected | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CDKN2A | NM_000077.5 | MANE Select | c.341C>T | p.Pro114Leu | missense | Exon 2 of 3 | NP_000068.1 | ||
| CDKN2A | NM_058195.4 | MANE Plus Clinical | c.384C>T | p.Ala128Ala | synonymous | Exon 2 of 3 | NP_478102.2 | ||
| CDKN2A | NM_001195132.2 | c.341C>T | p.Pro114Leu | missense | Exon 2 of 4 | NP_001182061.1 |
Ensembl Transcripts
| Selected | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CDKN2A | ENST00000304494.10 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.341C>T | p.Pro114Leu | missense | Exon 2 of 3 | ENSP00000307101.5 | ||
| CDKN2A | ENST00000498124.1 | TSL:1 | c.341C>T | p.Pro114Leu | missense | Exon 2 of 4 | ENSP00000418915.1 | ||
| CDKN2A | ENST00000579755.2 | TSL:1 MANE Plus Clinical | c.384C>T | p.Ala128Ala | synonymous | Exon 2 of 3 | ENSP00000462950.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.00 AC: 0AN: 239394 AF XY: 0.00
GnomAD4 exome Cov.: 31
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Familial melanoma Pathogenic:1Uncertain:1
Variant summary: CDKN2A c.341C>T (p.Pro114Leu) results in a non-conservative amino acid change located in the Ankyrin repeat-containing domain (IPR020683) of the encoded protein sequence. Five of five in-silico tools predict a damaging effect of the variant on protein function. The variant was absent in 239394 control chromosomes (gnomAD). c.341C>T has been reported as a germline mutation in the literature in several individuals affected with familial melanoma (e.g. Fargnoli_1998, Spica_2011, Pellegrini_2019). However, no co-segregation studies have been performed, therefore these data do not allow any definitive conclusion about variant significance. The variant has also been reported numerous times as a somatic mutation in melanomas and other cancers. Multiple publications report experimental evidence evaluating an impact on protein function, indicating that the variant is non-functional and unable to bind Cdk4/Cdk6 or induce G1 cell cycle arrest in-vitro (e.g. Koh_1995, Parry_1996, Byeon_1998, Jiang_1998, Gump_2001, Miller _2011). Two other clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation. One laboratory cited the variant as pathogenic and one laboratory cited the variant as uncertain significance. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as likely pathogenic.
This sequence change replaces proline with leucine at codon 114 of the CDKN2A (p16INK4a) protein (p.Pro114Leu). The proline residue is highly conserved and there is a moderate physicochemical difference between proline and leucine. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. This variant has been reported to affect CDKN2A (p16INK4a) protein function (PMID: 7777060, 7777061, 8668202, 9328469, 9053859, 12606942, 21462282). This variant has been observed in several individuals affected with melanoma (PMID: 9856841, 21462282). Segregation studies have not been reported. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 77637). This variant is not present in population databases (ExAC no frequency).
Malignant tumor of urinary bladder Pathogenic:1
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Pathogenic:1
The p.P114L variant (also known as c.341C>T), located in coding exon 2 of the CDKN2A gene, results from a C to T substitution at nucleotide position 341. The proline at codon 114 is replaced by leucine, an amino acid with similar properties. This alteration is non functional in multiple studies including with respect to CDK4/6 binding and cell cycle control (Miller PJ et al. Hum. Mutat. 2011 Aug;32(8):900-11; Parry and Peters, Mol. Cell. Biol. 1996 Jul;16(7):3844-52; Tevelev A et al. Biochemistry 1996 Jul;35(29):9475-87). This alteration has been observed in multiple individuals who have a personal or family history that is consistent with CDKN2A-associated disease (Ambry internal data; Fargnoli MC et al. J. Invest. Dermatol., 1998 Dec;111:1202-6; Miller PJ et al. Hum. Mutat., 2011 Aug;32:900-11). This amino acid position is highly conserved in available vertebrate species. In addition, this alteration is predicted to be deleterious by in silico analysis. Based on the majority of available evidence to date, this alteration is interpreted as a disease-causing mutation.
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at