rs121918719
Variant summary
Our verdict is Pathogenic. Variant got 16 ACMG points: 16P and 0B. PM2PM5PP3_StrongPP5_Very_Strong
The NM_000359.3(TGM1):c.428G>A(p.Arg143His) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000149 in 1,613,930 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely pathogenic (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R143C) has been classified as Pathogenic.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000359.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Pathogenic. Variant got 16 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TGM1 | NM_000359.3 | c.428G>A | p.Arg143His | missense_variant | 3/15 | ENST00000206765.11 | NP_000350.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TGM1 | ENST00000206765.11 | c.428G>A | p.Arg143His | missense_variant | 3/15 | 1 | NM_000359.3 | ENSP00000206765 | P1 | |
TGM1 | ENST00000544573.5 | c.-29+352G>A | intron_variant | 2 | ENSP00000439446 | |||||
TGM1 | ENST00000558074.1 | downstream_gene_variant | 5 | ENSP00000453840 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00000658 AC: 1AN: 152044Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000119 AC: 3AN: 251434Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000147 AC XY: 2AN XY: 135898
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000157 AC: 23AN: 1461886Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000234 AC XY: 17AN XY: 727242
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00000658 AC: 1AN: 152044Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000135 AC XY: 1AN XY: 74264
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Autosomal recessive congenital ichthyosis 1 Pathogenic:5
Likely pathogenic, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Counsyl | Jan 10, 2017 | - - |
Pathogenic, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Baylor Genetics | Jan 16, 2024 | - - |
Pathogenic, no assertion criteria provided | literature only | OMIM | Nov 01, 2006 | - - |
Pathogenic, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Natera, Inc. | Mar 03, 2021 | - - |
Likely pathogenic, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | - | - - |
Abnormality of the skin Pathogenic:1
Pathogenic, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Kariminejad - Najmabadi Pathology & Genetics Center | Jul 10, 2021 | - - |
not provided Pathogenic:1
Pathogenic, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Mar 03, 2023 | This sequence change replaces arginine, which is basic and polar, with histidine, which is basic and polar, at codon 143 of the TGM1 protein (p.Arg143His). This variant is present in population databases (rs121918719, gnomAD 0.004%). This missense change has been observed in individuals with autosomal recessive congenital ichthyosis (PMID: 27025581, 31168818). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 12481). Advanced modeling of protein sequence and biophysical properties (such as structural, functional, and spatial information, amino acid conservation, physicochemical variation, residue mobility, and thermodynamic stability) performed at Invitae indicates that this missense variant is expected to disrupt TGM1 protein function. Experimental studies have shown that this missense change affects TGM1 function (PMID: 9593710). This variant disrupts the p.Arg143 amino acid residue in TGM1. Other variant(s) that disrupt this residue have been determined to be pathogenic (PMID: 9326318, 26220141, 28403434). This suggests that this residue is clinically significant, and that variants that disrupt this residue are likely to be disease-causing. For these reasons, this variant has been classified as Pathogenic. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at