rs121965079
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -12 ACMG points: 0P and 12B. BP4_ModerateBP6BP7BS1BS2
The NM_000260.4(MYO7A):c.448C>A(p.Arg150Arg) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000482 in 1,613,852 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000260.4 synonymous
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -12 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MYO7A | ENST00000409709.9 | c.448C>A | p.Arg150Arg | synonymous_variant | Exon 5 of 49 | 1 | NM_000260.4 | ENSP00000386331.3 | ||
MYO7A | ENST00000458637.6 | c.448C>A | p.Arg150Arg | synonymous_variant | Exon 5 of 49 | 1 | ENSP00000392185.2 | |||
MYO7A | ENST00000409619.6 | c.415C>A | p.Arg139Arg | synonymous_variant | Exon 6 of 50 | 1 | ENSP00000386635.2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000355 AC: 54AN: 152186Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000450 AC: 112AN: 248858Hom.: 1 AF XY: 0.000563 AC XY: 76AN XY: 135032
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000495 AC: 724AN: 1461548Hom.: 2 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.000565 AC XY: 411AN XY: 727030
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000355 AC: 54AN: 152304Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.000349 AC XY: 26AN XY: 74478
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:3
MYO7A: BP4, BS2 -
This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
- -
Autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 2 Uncertain:1Benign:1
This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases did not allow this variant to be ruled in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. -
- -
Autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing loss 11 Uncertain:1Benign:1
- -
This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases did not allow this variant to be ruled in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. -
Usher syndrome type 1 Uncertain:1Benign:1
This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases did not allow this variant to be ruled in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. -
- -
not specified Benign:2
Arg150Arg in exon 5 of MYO7A: This variant is not expected to have clinical sign ificance because it does not alter an amino acid residue and is not located with in the splice consensus sequence. It has been identified in 7/8372 of European A merican chromosomes and 1/4076 of African American chromosomes by the NHLBI Exom e Sequencing Project (http://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS/; dbSNP rs121965079). -
- -
Usher syndrome type 1B Uncertain:1
- -
Retinal dystrophy Uncertain:1
- -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at