rs12218559

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The NM_022124.6(CDH23):​c.4299T>A​(p.Pro1433Pro) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0153 in 1,613,860 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1,910 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.020 ( 215 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.015 ( 1695 hom. )

Consequence

CDH23
NM_022124.6 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:10

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.849

Publications

8 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
CDH23 (HGNC:13733): (cadherin related 23) This gene is a member of the cadherin superfamily, whose genes encode calcium dependent cell-cell adhesion glycoproteins. The encoded protein is thought to be involved in stereocilia organization and hair bundle formation. The gene is located in a region containing the human deafness loci DFNB12 and USH1D. Usher syndrome 1D and nonsyndromic autosomal recessive deafness DFNB12 are caused by allelic mutations of this cadherin-like gene. Upregulation of this gene may also be associated with breast cancer. Alternative splice variants encoding different isoforms have been described. [provided by RefSeq, May 2013]
CDH23 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 12
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P, PanelApp Australia
  • nonsyndromic genetic hearing loss
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
  • Usher syndrome type 1
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: ClinGen, Orphanet
  • Usher syndrome type 1D
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), PanelApp Australia
  • hearing loss, autosomal recessive
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.84).
BP6
Variant 10-71738587-T-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr10-71738587-T-A is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 45942.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.849 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (EAS) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.183 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
CDH23NM_022124.6 linkc.4299T>A p.Pro1433Pro synonymous_variant Exon 35 of 70 ENST00000224721.12 NP_071407.4 Q9H251-1Q6P152

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
CDH23ENST00000224721.12 linkc.4299T>A p.Pro1433Pro synonymous_variant Exon 35 of 70 5 NM_022124.6 ENSP00000224721.9 Q9H251-1
CDH23ENST00000398792.3 linkn.988T>A non_coding_transcript_exon_variant Exon 6 of 9 2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0202
AC:
3076
AN:
152224
Hom.:
213
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00212
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0999
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.0107
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.193
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.0213
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.0118
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.0253
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00206
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0216
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.0444
AC:
11054
AN:
249154
AF XY:
0.0372
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00200
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.180
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.0155
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.181
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0105
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00252
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.0349
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0148
AC:
21673
AN:
1461518
Hom.:
1695
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.0144
AC XY:
10453
AN XY:
727040
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00191
AC:
64
AN:
33480
American (AMR)
AF:
0.171
AC:
7649
AN:
44722
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0149
AC:
389
AN:
26136
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.202
AC:
8021
AN:
39700
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0241
AC:
2079
AN:
86258
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0112
AC:
595
AN:
53222
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.0253
AC:
146
AN:
5768
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00129
AC:
1435
AN:
1111862
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0215
AC:
1295
AN:
60370
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.491
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1131
2261
3392
4522
5653
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
282
564
846
1128
1410
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0203
AC:
3089
AN:
152342
Hom.:
215
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.0230
AC XY:
1716
AN XY:
74498
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00212
AC:
88
AN:
41588
American (AMR)
AF:
0.101
AC:
1538
AN:
15302
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0107
AC:
37
AN:
3470
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.193
AC:
1000
AN:
5180
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0215
AC:
104
AN:
4832
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0118
AC:
125
AN:
10628
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.0272
AC:
8
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00206
AC:
140
AN:
68026
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0232
AC:
49
AN:
2110
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.500
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
137
274
410
547
684
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
38
76
114
152
190
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.00799
Hom.:
19
Bravo
AF:
0.0294
Asia WGS
AF:
0.0840
AC:
292
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:10
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:3
Jun 12, 2009
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Mar 05, 2013
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Oct 08, 2013
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Usher syndrome type 1D Benign:2
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Jul 01, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:2
Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

Autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 12 Benign:2
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Jul 01, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Usher syndrome type 1 Benign:1
Sep 16, 2020
Natera, Inc.
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.84
CADD
Benign
0.15
DANN
Benign
0.73
PhyloP100
-0.85
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs12218559; hg19: chr10-73498344; COSMIC: COSV56467645; COSMIC: COSV56467645; API