Menu
GeneBe

rs12218564

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The NM_022124.6(CDH23):c.4341T>C(p.Asp1447=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0106 in 1,613,346 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1,267 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.017 ( 155 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.010 ( 1112 hom. )

Consequence

CDH23
NM_022124.6 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:9

Conservation

PhyloP100: -1.24
Variant links:
Genes affected
CDH23 (HGNC:13733): (cadherin related 23) This gene is a member of the cadherin superfamily, whose genes encode calcium dependent cell-cell adhesion glycoproteins. The encoded protein is thought to be involved in stereocilia organization and hair bundle formation. The gene is located in a region containing the human deafness loci DFNB12 and USH1D. Usher syndrome 1D and nonsyndromic autosomal recessive deafness DFNB12 are caused by allelic mutations of this cadherin-like gene. Upregulation of this gene may also be associated with breast cancer. Alternative splice variants encoding different isoforms have been described. [provided by RefSeq, May 2013]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.85).
BP6
Variant 10-71738629-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr10-71738629-T-C is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 45945.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-1.24 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (EAS) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.133 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
CDH23NM_022124.6 linkuse as main transcriptc.4341T>C p.Asp1447= synonymous_variant 35/70 ENST00000224721.12

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
CDH23ENST00000224721.12 linkuse as main transcriptc.4341T>C p.Asp1447= synonymous_variant 35/705 NM_022124.6 P1Q9H251-1
CDH23ENST00000398792.3 linkuse as main transcriptn.1030T>C non_coding_transcript_exon_variant 6/92

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0167
AC:
2537
AN:
152200
Hom.:
153
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00164
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0982
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00317
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.142
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00393
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.0113
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000617
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0177
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.0374
AC:
9300
AN:
248412
Hom.:
836
AF XY:
0.0298
AC XY:
4022
AN XY:
134874
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00155
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.178
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00458
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.144
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00199
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0102
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000631
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.0274
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00999
AC:
14596
AN:
1461028
Hom.:
1112
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00890
AC XY:
6472
AN XY:
726792
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00146
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.169
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00398
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.126
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00240
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.0108
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.000264
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.0130
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0167
AC:
2547
AN:
152318
Hom.:
155
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.0191
AC XY:
1421
AN XY:
74478
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00164
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.0988
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00317
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.142
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00394
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.0113
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.000617
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.0185
Alfa
AF:
0.00988
Hom.:
60
Bravo
AF:
0.0262
Asia WGS
AF:
0.0490
AC:
172
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.000273
EpiControl
AF:
0.000593

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:9
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLaboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized MedicineJun 12, 2009- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEurofins Ntd Llc (ga)Oct 08, 2013- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxMar 05, 2013This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
not provided Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP LaboratoriesNov 08, 2023- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAthena DiagnosticsJul 31, 2018- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeFeb 01, 2024- -
Usher syndrome type 1 Benign:1
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingNatera, Inc.Sep 16, 2020- -
Usher syndrome type 1D Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 12 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.85
Cadd
Benign
0.63
Dann
Benign
0.66

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs12218564; hg19: chr10-73498386; API