rs12316677

Variant names:

Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_003276.2(TMPO):c.1632T>A(p.Ile544Ile) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0025 in 1,614,170 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 75 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.014 ( 41 hom., cov: 33)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.0013 ( 34 hom. )

Consequence

TMPO
NM_003276.2 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:5

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.823

Variant links:

Genes affected

TMPO (HGNC:11875): (thymopoietin) Through alternative splicing, this gene encodes several distinct LEM domain containing protein isoforms. LEM domain proteins include inner nuclear membrane and intranuclear proteins, and are involved in a variety of cellular functions including gene expression, chromatin organization, and replication and cell cycle control. The encoded alpha isoform is broadly diffuse in the nucleus and contains a lamin binding domain, while the beta and gamma isoforms are localized to the nuclear membrane and contain an HDAC3 interaction domain. The distinct isoforms may compete with each other when acting to chaperone other proteins and regulate transcription. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2019]

TMPO links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.65).

BP6

Variant 12-98533889-T-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr12-98533889-T-A is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 44666.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.823 with no splicing effect.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.014 (2130/152316) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.0485 (2017/41562). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0468. There are 41 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 989 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck.

BS2

High AC in GnomAd4 at 2130 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
TMPO	NM_001032283.3 link	c.565+2051T>A		intron_variant	Intron 3 of 8	ENST00000556029.6	NP_001027454.1	P42167-1A0A024RBE7Q59G12

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
TMPO	ENST00000556029.6 link	c.565+2051T>A		intron_variant	Intron 3 of 8	1	NM_001032283.3	ENSP00000450627.1		P42167-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.0140

AC:

2130

AN:

152198

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0487

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00504

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.000147

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.0124

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.00350

AC:

879

AN:

251270

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.00254

AC XY:

345

AN XY:

135818

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.0491

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00188

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.0000993

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0000880

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00114

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.00130

AC:

1899

AN:

1461854

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00112

AC XY:

812

AN XY:

727220

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.0484

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.00203

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.0000348

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.0000243

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.00253

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.0140

AC:

2130

AN:

152316

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0133

AC XY:

989

AN XY:

74484

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.0485

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00504

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.000147

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.0123

Alfa

AF:

0.00130

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.0161

Asia WGS

AF:

0.00115

AC:

AN:

3478

EpiCase

AF:

0.0000545

EpiControl

AF:

0.000178

ClinVar

Significance: Benign

Submissions summary: Benign:5

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified

Benign:3

Jan 15, 2016

Ambry Genetics

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Mar 19, 2012

Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

p.Ile544Ile in Exon 04 of TMPO: This variant is not expected to have clinical si gnificance because it does not alter an amino acid residue, is not located withi n the splice consensus sequence and has been identified in 4.9% (183/3738) of Af rican American chromosomes from a broad population by the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (http://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS; dbSNP rs12316677). -

Apr 20, 2014

GeneDx

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

not provided

Benign:1

Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: not provided

- -

Loeys-Dietz syndrome 2

Benign:1

Feb 02, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.65

CADD

Benign

DANN

Benign

0.84

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over