rs1235137905

Variant names:

Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Uncertain significance. The variant received 0 ACMG points: 2P and 2B. PM2BP4_Moderate

The NM_016169.4(SUFU):c.750C>A(p.His250Gln) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000186 in 1,613,968 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. H250R) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0000066 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.0000014 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

SUFU
NM_016169.4 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Uncertain significance criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts U:3

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.111

Publications

0 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

SUFU (HGNC:16466): (SUFU negative regulator of hedgehog signaling) The Hedgehog signaling pathway plays an important role in early human development. The pathway is a signaling cascade that plays a role in pattern formation and cellular proliferation during development. This gene encodes a negative regulator of the hedgehog signaling pathway. Defects in this gene are a cause of medulloblastoma. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants.[provided by RefSeq, May 2010]

SUFU Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

medulloblastoma
Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), ClinGen
nevoid basal cell carcinoma syndrome
Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, Illumina, Genomics England PanelApp
basal cell nevus syndrome 2
Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: G2P
ocular motor apraxia, Cogan type
Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Franklin by Genoox
Joubert syndrome 32
Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG, LIMITED Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P, Ambry Genetics
Joubert syndrome
Inheritance: AR, AD Classification: MODERATE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, Ambry Genetics
apraxia
Inheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics
ciliopathy
Inheritance: AR Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: ClinGen

SUFU links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Uncertain_significance. The variant received 0 ACMG points.

PM2

Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.15042615).

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
SUFU	NM_016169.4 link	c.750C>A	p.His250Gln	missense_variant	Exon 6 of 12	ENST00000369902.8	NP_057253.2	Q9UMX1-1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	UniProt
SUFU	ENST00000369902.8 link	c.750C>A	p.His250Gln	missense_variant	Exon 6 of 12	1	NM_016169.4	ENSP00000358918.4	Q9UMX1-1
SUFU	ENST00000423559.2 link	c.750C>A	p.His250Gln	missense_variant	Exon 6 of 10	1		ENSP00000411597.2	Q9UMX1-3
SUFU	ENST00000369899.6 link	c.750C>A	p.His250Gln	missense_variant	Exon 6 of 11	1		ENSP00000358915.2	Q9UMX1-2
SUFU	ENST00000471000.1 link	n.532C>A		non_coding_transcript_exon_variant	Exon 4 of 6	5

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00000657

AC:

AN:

152172

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.0000655

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.00000137

AC:

AN:

1461796

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00000138

AC XY:

AN XY:

727202

show subpopulations

⚠️ The allele balance in gnomAD version 4 Exomes is significantly skewed from the expected value of 0.5.

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

33478

American (AMR)

AF:

0.0000447

AC:

AN:

44722

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

26134

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

39700

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

86254

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

53404

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5766

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

1111952

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

60386

⚠️ The allele balance in gnomAD4 Exomes is highly skewed from 0.5 (p-value = 0.000000), which strongly suggests a high chance of mosaicism in these individuals.

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.350

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00000657

AC:

AN:

152172

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000135

AC XY:

AN XY:

74346

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

41432

American (AMR)

AF:

0.0000655

AC:

AN:

15272

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3472

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5192

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4830

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10624

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

316

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

68028

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

2094

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.425

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

ClinVar

Significance: Uncertain significance

Submissions summary: Uncertain:3

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Joubert syndrome 32

Uncertain:1

Jun 19, 2019

Knight Diagnostic Laboratories, Oregon Health and Sciences University

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Gorlin syndrome;C0025149:Medulloblastoma

Uncertain:1

Aug 28, 2024

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This sequence change replaces histidine, which is basic and polar, with glutamine, which is neutral and polar, at codon 250 of the SUFU protein (p.His250Gln). This variant is present in population databases (no rsID available, gnomAD 0.009%). This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with SUFU-related conditions. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 453977). Invitae Evidence Modeling of protein sequence and biophysical properties (such as structural, functional, and spatial information, amino acid conservation, physicochemical variation, residue mobility, and thermodynamic stability) indicates that this missense variant is not expected to disrupt SUFU protein function with a negative predictive value of 80%. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome

Uncertain:1

Oct 31, 2023

Ambry Genetics

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

The p.H250Q variant (also known as c.750C>A), located in coding exon 6 of the SUFU gene, results from a C to A substitution at nucleotide position 750. The histidine at codon 250 is replaced by glutamine, an amino acid with highly similar properties. This amino acid position is highly conserved in available vertebrate species. In addition, the in silico prediction for this alteration is inconclusive. Since supporting evidence is limited at this time, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.16

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.0031

BayesDel_noAF

Uncertain

-0.070

CADD

Benign

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.96

DEOGEN2

Benign

0.14

T;.;.

Eigen

Benign

-0.45

Eigen_PC

Benign

-0.29

FATHMM_MKL

Uncertain

0.83

LIST_S2

Benign

0.74

T;T;T

M_CAP

Benign

0.032

MetaRNN

Benign

0.15

T;T;T

MetaSVM

Benign

-0.80

MutationAssessor

Benign

-0.69

N;N;N

PhyloP100

0.11

PrimateAI

Uncertain

0.71

PROVEAN

Benign

-0.33

N;N;N

REVEL

Uncertain

0.41

Sift

Benign

0.34

T;T;T

Sift4G

Benign

0.53

T;T;T

Polyphen

0.0

B;B;B

Vest4

0.20

MutPred

0.34

Gain of disorder (P = 0.1621);Gain of disorder (P = 0.1621);Gain of disorder (P = 0.1621);

MVP

0.92

MPC

0.61

ClinPred

0.11

GERP RS

1.5

RBP_binding_hub_radar

0.0

RBP_regulation_power_radar

1.7

Varity_R

0.41

gMVP

0.50

Mutation Taster

=31/69

disease causing

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over