rs12420129
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -15 ACMG points: 1P and 16B. PP3BP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_000260.4(MYO7A):c.468C>T(p.Ile156=) variant causes a splice region, synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.026 in 1,613,478 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1,402 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 2/3 splice prediction tools predicting alterations to normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000260.4 splice_region, synonymous
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -15 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MYO7A | NM_000260.4 | c.468C>T | p.Ile156= | splice_region_variant, synonymous_variant | 5/49 | ENST00000409709.9 | NP_000251.3 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MYO7A | ENST00000409709.9 | c.468C>T | p.Ile156= | splice_region_variant, synonymous_variant | 5/49 | 1 | NM_000260.4 | ENSP00000386331 | ||
MYO7A | ENST00000458637.6 | c.468C>T | p.Ile156= | splice_region_variant, synonymous_variant | 5/49 | 1 | ENSP00000392185 | P1 | ||
MYO7A | ENST00000409619.6 | c.435C>T | p.Ile145= | splice_region_variant, synonymous_variant | 6/50 | 1 | ENSP00000386635 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0308 AC: 4686AN: 152224Hom.: 209 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0455 AC: 11310AN: 248320Hom.: 709 AF XY: 0.0388 AC XY: 5230AN XY: 134754
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0255 AC: 37188AN: 1461136Hom.: 1193 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0242 AC XY: 17570AN XY: 726798
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0308 AC: 4690AN: 152342Hom.: 209 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0354 AC XY: 2637AN XY: 74494
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | Oct 29, 2008 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | May 09, 2013 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | May 12, 2013 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
not provided Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Athena Diagnostics | Aug 10, 2018 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing loss 11 Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Centre for Mendelian Genomics, University Medical Centre Ljubljana | Jan 16, 2020 | This variant was classified as: Benign. The following ACMG criteria were applied in classifying this variant: BS1,BS2. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 2 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Usher syndrome type 1B Benign:1
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Natera, Inc. | Sep 16, 2020 | - - |
Usher syndrome type 1 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at