rs12449554
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1
The NM_001369369.1(FOXN1):c.852T>C(p.Leu284Leu) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0906 in 1,603,446 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 8,409 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001369369.1 synonymous
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FOXN1 | NM_001369369.1 | c.852T>C | p.Leu284Leu | synonymous_variant | Exon 6 of 9 | ENST00000579795.6 | NP_001356298.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FOXN1 | ENST00000579795.6 | c.852T>C | p.Leu284Leu | synonymous_variant | Exon 6 of 9 | 1 | NM_001369369.1 | ENSP00000464645.1 | ||
FOXN1 | ENST00000226247.2 | c.852T>C | p.Leu284Leu | synonymous_variant | Exon 5 of 8 | 1 | ENSP00000226247.2 | |||
RSKR | ENST00000481916.6 | n.*1195+73281A>G | intron_variant | Intron 7 of 7 | 1 | ENSP00000436369.2 | ||||
FOXN1 | ENST00000577936.2 | c.852T>C | p.Leu284Leu | synonymous_variant | Exon 6 of 9 | 4 | ENSP00000462159.2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0912 AC: 13864AN: 151968Hom.: 861 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.114 AC: 28548AN: 251460Hom.: 2339 AF XY: 0.107 AC XY: 14502AN XY: 135902
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0905 AC: 131357AN: 1451360Hom.: 7544 Cov.: 28 AF XY: 0.0889 AC XY: 64242AN XY: 722770
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0913 AC: 13880AN: 152086Hom.: 865 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0954 AC XY: 7094AN XY: 74348
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:3
This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Variant identified in a genome or exome case(s) and assessed due to predicted null impact of the variant or pathogenic assertions in the literature or databases. Disclaimer: This variant has not undergone full assessment. The following are preliminary notes: Frequency -
This variant is classified as Benign based on local population frequency. This variant was detected in 36% of patients studied by a panel of primary immunodeficiencies. Number of patients: 34. Only high quality variants are reported. -
T-cell immunodeficiency, congenital alopecia, and nail dystrophy Benign:2
This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
- -
not provided Benign:1Other:1
- -
Variant interpreted as Benign and reported on 04-27-2020 by Lab or GTR ID 500031. GenomeConnect assertions are reported exactly as they appear on the patient-provided report from the testing laboratory. GenomeConnect staff make no attempt to reinterpret the clinical significance of the variant. This variant was reported in an individual referred for clinical diagnostic genetic testing. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at