rs12456284
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_005359.6(SMAD4):c.*5131A>G variant causes a 3 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.224 in 227,582 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 6,909 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign,confers sensitivity (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_005359.6 3_prime_UTR
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMAD4 | NM_005359.6 | c.*5131A>G | 3_prime_UTR_variant | Exon 12 of 12 | ENST00000342988.8 | NP_005350.1 | ||
SMAD4 | NM_001407041.1 | c.*5131A>G | 3_prime_UTR_variant | Exon 12 of 12 | NP_001393970.1 | |||
SMAD4 | NM_001407042.1 | c.*5131A>G | 3_prime_UTR_variant | Exon 12 of 12 | NP_001393971.1 | |||
SMAD4 | NR_176265.1 | n.7441A>G | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | Exon 13 of 13 |
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.199 AC: 30294AN: 151950Hom.: 3817 Cov.: 31
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.273 AC: 20600AN: 75512Hom.: 3089 Cov.: 0 AF XY: 0.273 AC XY: 9510AN XY: 34800
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.199 AC: 30307AN: 152070Hom.: 3820 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.203 AC XY: 15067AN XY: 74318
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:1
- -
Myhre syndrome Benign:1
This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
not provided Benign:1
- -
Generalized juvenile polyposis/juvenile polyposis coli Benign:1
This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Juvenile polyposis/hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia syndrome Benign:1
This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Lung cancer Other:1
Improve the prediction accuracy for overal survival in non-small cell lung cancer patients -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at