rs1247755
Variant names:
Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -12 ACMG points: 0P and 12B. BP4_StrongBA1
The NM_001161352.2(KCNMA1):c.1859+1616G>C variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.701 in 151,994 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 37,323 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar.
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.70 ( 37323 hom., cov: 31)
Consequence
KCNMA1
NM_001161352.2 intron
NM_001161352.2 intron
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Not reported in ClinVar
Conservation
PhyloP100: 0.389
Publications
3 publications found
Genes affected
KCNMA1 (HGNC:6284): (potassium calcium-activated channel subfamily M alpha 1) This gene encodes the alpha subunit of calcium-activated BK channel. The encoded protein is involved in several physiological processes including smooth muscle contraction, neurotransmitter release and neuronal excitability. Mutations in this gene are associated with a spectrum of neurological disorders including Paroxysmal Nonkinesigenic Dyskinesia 3, Idiopathic Generalized Epilepsy 16 and Liang-Wang syndrome. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2022]
KCNMA1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
- generalized epilepsy-paroxysmal dyskinesia syndromeInheritance: AD, AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, MODERATE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Illumina, G2P, Ambry Genetics, Orphanet, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), ClinGen
- Liang-Wang syndromeInheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Ambry Genetics
- cerebellar atrophy, developmental delay, and seizuresInheritance: AR Classification: STRONG, MODERATE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification was made for transcript
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -12 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.73).
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (EAS) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.798 is higher than 0.05.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.701 AC: 106438AN: 151876Hom.: 37285 Cov.: 31 show subpopulations
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
106438
AN:
151876
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
We have no GnomAD4 exomes data on this position. Probably position not covered by the project.
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.701 AC: 106533AN: 151994Hom.: 37323 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.701 AC XY: 52094AN XY: 74284 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
106533
AN:
151994
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
AC XY:
52094
AN XY:
74284
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
AC:
29446
AN:
41464
American (AMR)
AF:
AC:
11391
AN:
15264
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
AC:
2694
AN:
3470
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
AC:
4213
AN:
5146
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
AC:
3527
AN:
4822
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
AC:
6837
AN:
10560
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
AC:
198
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
AC:
46281
AN:
67960
Other (OTH)
AF:
AC:
1478
AN:
2104
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.503
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1645
3291
4936
6582
8227
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance
Age Distribution
Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
826
1652
2478
3304
4130
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
2603
AN:
3478
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
DANN
Benign
PhyloP100
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at
Publications
You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.