Menu
GeneBe

rs12662610

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The NM_001142800.2(EYS):ā€‹c.3936A>Gā€‹(p.Thr1312=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.128 in 1,532,292 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 13,596 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (ā˜…ā˜…).

Frequency

Genomes: š‘“ 0.10 ( 946 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes š‘“: 0.13 ( 12650 hom. )

Consequence

EYS
NM_001142800.2 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:9

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.00400
Variant links:
Genes affected
EYS (HGNC:21555): (eyes shut homolog) The product of this gene contains multiple epidermal growth factor (EGF)-like and LamG domains. The protein is expressed in the photoreceptor layer of the retina, and the gene is mutated in autosomal recessive retinitis pigmentosa. Multiple transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Dec 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.89).
BP6
Variant 6-64591931-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr6-64591931-T-C is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 93607.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr6-64591931-T-C is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.004 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (EAS) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.156 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
EYSNM_001142800.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.3936A>G p.Thr1312= synonymous_variant 26/43 ENST00000503581.6
EYSNM_001292009.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.3936A>G p.Thr1312= synonymous_variant 26/44

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
EYSENST00000503581.6 linkuse as main transcriptc.3936A>G p.Thr1312= synonymous_variant 26/435 NM_001142800.2 A2Q5T1H1-1
EYSENST00000370621.7 linkuse as main transcriptc.3936A>G p.Thr1312= synonymous_variant 26/441 P2Q5T1H1-3

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.104
AC:
15754
AN:
152028
Hom.:
946
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0458
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.105
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.125
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.0723
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.166
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.111
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.0738
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.0728
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.135
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.101
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.114
AC:
16802
AN:
147292
Hom.:
1099
AF XY:
0.115
AC XY:
8955
AN XY:
78090
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0393
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.128
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.0769
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.171
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.0975
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0794
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.128
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.114
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.130
AC:
179718
AN:
1380146
Hom.:
12650
Cov.:
34
AF XY:
0.130
AC XY:
88117
AN XY:
678948
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0394
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.129
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.0772
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.144
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.101
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.0798
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.139
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.124
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.104
AC:
15763
AN:
152146
Hom.:
946
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.102
AC XY:
7582
AN XY:
74392
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0460
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.125
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.0723
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.165
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.112
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.0738
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.135
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.0999
Alfa
AF:
0.117
Hom.:
454
Bravo
AF:
0.108
Asia WGS
AF:
0.124
AC:
431
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:9
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxAug 11, 2011This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center-- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingJoint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEurofins Ntd Llc (ga)Sep 19, 2013- -
Retinitis pigmentosa Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingNatera, Inc.Sep 16, 2020- -
not provided Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeFeb 01, 2024- -
Retinitis pigmentosa 25 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome-Nilou LabJul 01, 2021- -
Retinal dystrophy Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterresearchDept Of Ophthalmology, Nagoya UniversityOct 01, 2023- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.89
CADD
Benign
0.59
DANN
Benign
0.28

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs12662610; hg19: chr6-65301824; API