rs12720097

Positions:

chr15-90763011-G-A

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2

The NM_000057.4(BLM):c.1928G>A(p.Arg643His) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0047 in 1,613,418 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 21 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 16/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0028 ( 1 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.0049 ( 20 hom. )

Consequence

BLM
NM_000057.4 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:18O:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.456

Variant links:

Genes affected

BLM (HGNC:1058): (BLM RecQ like helicase) The Bloom syndrome is an autosomal recessive disorder characterized by growth deficiency, microcephaly and immunodeficiency among others. It is caused by homozygous or compound heterozygous mutation in the gene encoding DNA helicase RecQ protein on chromosome 15q26. This Bloom-associated helicase unwinds a variety of DNA substrates including Holliday junction, and is involved in several pathways contributing to the maintenance of genome stability. Identification of pathogenic Bloom variants is required for heterozygote testing in at-risk families. [provided by RefSeq, May 2020]

BLM links:

BLM (HGNC:):

BLM links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.004977405).

BP6

Variant 15-90763011-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr15-90763011-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 127480.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=8, Uncertain_significance=1, not_provided=1, Benign=3}. Variant chr15-90763011-G-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign]. Variant chr15-90763011-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign].

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00278 (424/152272) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.0045 (306/68010). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00408. There are 1 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 189 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 20 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	MANE	Protein	UniProt
BLM	NM_000057.4 linkuse as main transcript	c.1928G>A	p.Arg643His	missense_variant	8/22	ENST00000355112.8	NP_000048.1	P54132

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
BLM	ENST00000355112.8 linkuse as main transcript	c.1928G>A	p.Arg643His	missense_variant	8/22	1	NM_000057.4	ENSP00000347232.3		P54132

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00279

AC:

424

AN:

152154

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.000917

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000720

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00288

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.000192

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00331

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00302

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00949

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00450

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00335

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.00333

AC:

833

AN:

250174

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.00349

AC XY:

472

AN XY:

135236

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.000867

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00134

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00279

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.0000545

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.00382

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00315

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00471

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00428

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.00490

AC:

7165

AN:

1461146

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00476

AC XY:

3459

AN XY:

726812

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.000539

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.00137

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00349

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.0000756

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.00394

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00240

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.00563

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.00403

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00278

AC:

424

AN:

152272

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00254

AC XY:

189

AN XY:

74446

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.000914

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.000719

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00288

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.000193

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00331

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00302

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.00450

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00331

Alfa

AF:

0.00395

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00257

TwinsUK

AF:

0.0105

AC:

ALSPAC

AF:

0.00649

AC:

ESP6500AA

AF:

0.00227

AC:

ESP6500EA

AF:

0.00465

AC:

ExAC

AF:

0.00315

AC:

383

Asia WGS

AF:

0.00144

AC:

AN:

3478

EpiCase

AF:

0.00436

EpiControl

AF:

0.00391

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:18Other:1

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Bloom syndrome

Uncertain:1Benign:5

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina	Jan 13, 2018	This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp	Feb 01, 2024	- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Genome-Nilou Lab	Jun 10, 2021	- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter	research	CSER _CC_NCGL, University of Washington	Mar 11, 2015	- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided	clinical testing	Natera, Inc.	Jul 05, 2017	- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories	Oct 18, 2023	- -

not specified

Benign:5Other:1

not provided, no classification provided	reference population	ITMI	Sep 19, 2013	- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided	clinical testing	Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago	-	Likely benign based on allele frequency in 1000 Genomes Project or ESP global frequency and its presence in a patient with a rare or unrelated disease phenotype. NOT Sanger confirmed. -
Benign, no assertion criteria provided	clinical testing	Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht	-	- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp	Oct 17, 2022	Variant summary: BLM c.1928G>A (p.Arg643His) results in a non-conservative amino acid change located in the Bloom syndrome protein, BDHCT-box associated domain (IPR032439) of the encoded protein sequence. Three of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0032 in 281568 control chromosomes, predominantly at a frequency of 0.0046 within the Non-Finnish European subpopulation in the gnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. The observed variant frequency within Non-Finnish European control individuals in the gnomAD database is approximately 1.3 fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in BLM causing Bloom Syndrome phenotype (0.0035), strongly suggesting that the variant is a benign polymorphism found primarily in populations of Non-Finnish European origin. The variant, c.1928G>A, has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with breast cancer (Thompson_2012, Moradian_2021) and as a somatic events in glioblastoma and Mullerian adenosarcoma (Burzynski_2015, Howitt_2015). These report(s) do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Hereditary Cancer and/or Bloom Syndrome. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. Ten clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation. Nine submitters classified the variant as LB/B while one classified as VUS. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as benign. -
Benign, no assertion criteria provided	clinical testing	Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+	-	- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)	Aug 01, 2016	- -

not provided

Benign:5

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	GeneDx	Dec 01, 2020	This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 24728327) -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen	Nov 01, 2024	BLM: BP4, BS2 -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Institute for Clinical Genetics, University Hospital TU Dresden, University Hospital TU Dresden	Nov 03, 2021	- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided	clinical testing	Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center	-	- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided	clinical testing	Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center	-	- -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome

Benign:2

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	curation	Sema4, Sema4	Jun 14, 2021	- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Ambry Genetics	Dec 21, 2018	This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

BLM-related disorder

Benign:1

Benign, no assertion criteria provided

clinical testing

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Jun 17, 2019

This variant is classified as benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.063

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.52

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.51

CADD

Benign

2.8

DANN

Benign

0.88

DEOGEN2

Benign

0.078

T;.

Eigen

Benign

-1.1

Eigen_PC

Benign

-1.0

FATHMM_MKL

Benign

0.73

LIST_S2

Benign

0.77

T;T

M_CAP

Benign

0.034

MetaRNN

Benign

0.0050

T;T

MetaSVM

Benign

-1.0

MutationAssessor

Benign

0.015

N;.

PrimateAI

Benign

0.20

PROVEAN

Benign

-1.0

N;N

REVEL

Benign

0.14

Sift

Benign

0.31

T;T

Sift4G

Benign

0.28

T;T

Polyphen

0.0040

B;.

Vest4

0.11

MVP

0.67

MPC

0.11

ClinPred

0.0095

GERP RS

-3.9

Varity_R

0.057

gMVP

0.50

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.12

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over