rs12742170
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1
The NM_000069.3(CACNA1S):āc.1371T>Gā(p.Pro457Pro) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.322 in 1,613,478 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 94,186 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (ā ā ). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. P457P) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000069.3 synonymous
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CACNA1S | NM_000069.3 | c.1371T>G | p.Pro457Pro | synonymous_variant | 10/44 | ENST00000362061.4 | NP_000060.2 | |
CACNA1S | XM_005245478.4 | c.1371T>G | p.Pro457Pro | synonymous_variant | 10/43 | XP_005245535.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CACNA1S | ENST00000362061.4 | c.1371T>G | p.Pro457Pro | synonymous_variant | 10/44 | 1 | NM_000069.3 | ENSP00000355192.3 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.239 AC: 36305AN: 151928Hom.: 5760 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.239 AC: 60097AN: 251058Hom.: 9155 AF XY: 0.245 AC XY: 33189AN XY: 135674
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.331 AC: 483427AN: 1461434Hom.: 88423 Cov.: 46 AF XY: 0.326 AC XY: 236910AN XY: 727026
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.239 AC: 36309AN: 152044Hom.: 5763 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.227 AC XY: 16913AN XY: 74346
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:5
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+ | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Jan 05, 2016 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Athena Diagnostics | Jun 22, 2021 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Hypokalemic periodic paralysis, type 1 Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Apr 27, 2017 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases was too high to be consistent with this variant causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as benign. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Jul 14, 2021 | - - |
not provided Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Malignant hyperthermia, susceptibility to, 5;C3714580:Hypokalemic periodic paralysis, type 1 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Malignant hyperthermia, susceptibility to, 5 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | All of Us Research Program, National Institutes of Health | Feb 05, 2024 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at