rs12805398
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points: 0P and 19B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1
The NM_004621.6(TRPC6):c.2712G>A(p.Gln904Gln) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.119 in 1,613,612 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 12,329 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.090 ( 842 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.12 ( 11487 hom. )
Consequence
TRPC6
NM_004621.6 synonymous
NM_004621.6 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -0.0810
Genes affected
TRPC6 (HGNC:12338): (transient receptor potential cation channel subfamily C member 6) The protein encoded by this gene forms a receptor-activated calcium channel in the cell membrane. The channel is activated by diacylglycerol and is thought to be under the control of a phosphatidylinositol second messenger system. Activation of this channel occurs independently of protein kinase C and is not triggered by low levels of intracellular calcium. Defects in this gene are a cause of focal segmental glomerulosclerosis 2 (FSGS2). [provided by RefSeq, Mar 2009]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.39).
BP6
Variant 11-101453039-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr11-101453039-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 259462.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr11-101453039-C-T is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.081 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (NFE) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.127 is higher than 0.05.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TRPC6 | NM_004621.6 | c.2712G>A | p.Gln904Gln | synonymous_variant | 13/13 | ENST00000344327.8 | NP_004612.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TRPC6 | ENST00000344327.8 | c.2712G>A | p.Gln904Gln | synonymous_variant | 13/13 | 1 | NM_004621.6 | ENSP00000340913.3 | ||
TRPC6 | ENST00000360497.4 | c.2547G>A | p.Gln849Gln | synonymous_variant | 12/12 | 1 | ENSP00000353687.4 | |||
TRPC6 | ENST00000348423.8 | c.2364G>A | p.Gln788Gln | synonymous_variant | 11/11 | 1 | ENSP00000343672.4 | |||
TRPC6 | ENST00000532133.5 | c.2478G>A | p.Gln826Gln | synonymous_variant | 12/12 | 5 | ENSP00000435574.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0901 AC: 13702AN: 152096Hom.: 840 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
13702
AN:
152096
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.104 AC: 26050AN: 251026Hom.: 1544 AF XY: 0.109 AC XY: 14794AN XY: 135660
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
26050
AN:
251026
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
14794
AN XY:
135660
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.122 AC: 178699AN: 1461398Hom.: 11487 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.123 AC XY: 89468AN XY: 726996
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
178699
AN:
1461398
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
89468
AN XY:
726996
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0900 AC: 13699AN: 152214Hom.: 842 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0891 AC XY: 6631AN XY: 74416
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
13699
AN:
152214
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
6631
AN XY:
74416
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
237
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:7
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Oct 25, 2019 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Athena Diagnostics | Apr 12, 2017 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 29, 2024 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
not specified Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Unidad de Genómica Garrahan, Hospital de Pediatría Garrahan | Jul 15, 2024 | This variant is classified as Benign based on local population frequency. This variant was detected in 20% of patients studied in a panel designed for Epileptic and Developmental Encephalopathy and Progressive Myoclonus Epilepsy. Number of patients: 19. Only high quality variants are reported. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Focal segmental glomerulosclerosis 2 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at