rs1297274221
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -11 ACMG points: 2P and 13B. PM2BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7
The NM_000057.4(BLM):āc.3195T>Cā(p.Asn1065=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000554 in 1,445,022 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (ā ā ).
Frequency
Genomes: not found (cov: 32)
Exomes š: 0.0000055 ( 0 hom. )
Consequence
BLM
NM_000057.4 synonymous
NM_000057.4 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 1.32
Genes affected
BLM (HGNC:1058): (BLM RecQ like helicase) The Bloom syndrome is an autosomal recessive disorder characterized by growth deficiency, microcephaly and immunodeficiency among others. It is caused by homozygous or compound heterozygous mutation in the gene encoding DNA helicase RecQ protein on chromosome 15q26. This Bloom-associated helicase unwinds a variety of DNA substrates including Holliday junction, and is involved in several pathways contributing to the maintenance of genome stability. Identification of pathogenic Bloom variants is required for heterozygote testing in at-risk families. [provided by RefSeq, May 2020]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -11 ACMG points.
PM2
Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.57).
BP6
Variant 15-90794342-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr15-90794342-T-C is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 524824.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=1.33 with no splicing effect.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BLM | NM_000057.4 | c.3195T>C | p.Asn1065= | synonymous_variant | 16/22 | ENST00000355112.8 | NP_000048.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BLM | ENST00000355112.8 | c.3195T>C | p.Asn1065= | synonymous_variant | 16/22 | 1 | NM_000057.4 | ENSP00000347232 | P2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
Cov.:
32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00000415 AC: 1AN: 241058Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.00000769 AC XY: 1AN XY: 130056
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
1
AN:
241058
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
1
AN XY:
130056
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000554 AC: 8AN: 1445022Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00000697 AC XY: 5AN XY: 717744
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
8
AN:
1445022
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
AC XY:
5
AN XY:
717744
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
GnomAD4 genome
Cov.:
32
Bravo
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:4
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
Bloom syndrome Benign:2
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Natera, Inc. | Oct 13, 2020 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 18, 2024 | - - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | Sema4, Sema4 | Mar 07, 2022 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Sep 25, 2018 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at