rs13031275

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -19 ACMG points: 0P and 19B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The NM_001164507.2(NEB):​c.25395T>G​(p.Ser8465Ser) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0544 in 1,590,030 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2,772 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.038 ( 154 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.056 ( 2618 hom. )

Consequence

NEB
NM_001164507.2 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:8

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.804

Publications

9 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
NEB (HGNC:7720): (nebulin) This gene encodes nebulin, a giant protein component of the cytoskeletal matrix that coexists with the thick and thin filaments within the sarcomeres of skeletal muscle. In most vertebrates, nebulin accounts for 3 to 4% of the total myofibrillar protein. The encoded protein contains approximately 30-amino acid long modules that can be classified into 7 types and other repeated modules. Protein isoform sizes vary from 600 to 800 kD due to alternative splicing that is tissue-, species-,and developmental stage-specific. Of the 183 exons in the nebulin gene, at least 43 are alternatively spliced, although exons 143 and 144 are not found in the same transcript. Of the several thousand transcript variants predicted for nebulin, the RefSeq Project has decided to create three representative RefSeq records. Mutations in this gene are associated with recessive nemaline myopathy. [provided by RefSeq, Sep 2009]
RIF1 (HGNC:23207): (replication timing regulatory factor 1) This gene encodes a protein that shares homology with the yeast teleomere binding protein, Rap1 interacting factor 1. This protein localizes to aberrant telomeres may be involved in DNA repair. Alternate splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Apr 2010]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -19 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (REVEL=0.04).
BP6
Variant 2-151489980-A-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-151489980-A-C is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 129735.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.804 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (NFE) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.0592 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
NEBNM_001164507.2 linkc.25395T>G p.Ser8465Ser synonymous_variant Exon 181 of 182 ENST00000427231.7 NP_001157979.2
NEBNM_001164508.2 linkc.25395T>G p.Ser8465Ser synonymous_variant Exon 181 of 182 ENST00000397345.8 NP_001157980.2

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
NEBENST00000397345.8 linkc.25395T>G p.Ser8465Ser synonymous_variant Exon 181 of 182 5 NM_001164508.2 ENSP00000380505.3 P20929-2
NEBENST00000427231.7 linkc.25395T>G p.Ser8465Ser synonymous_variant Exon 181 of 182 5 NM_001164507.2 ENSP00000416578.2 P20929-3

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0379
AC:
5775
AN:
152176
Hom.:
154
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0119
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.0921
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0268
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.0493
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.000192
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.0176
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.0287
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.0475
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0607
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0373
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.0418
AC:
10392
AN:
248880
AF XY:
0.0425
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0120
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0217
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.0451
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.0000557
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0311
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0657
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.0437
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0561
AC:
80722
AN:
1437736
Hom.:
2618
Cov.:
29
AF XY:
0.0554
AC XY:
39726
AN XY:
716786
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00966
AC:
318
AN:
32914
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0232
AC:
1038
AN:
44688
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0458
AC:
1191
AN:
26016
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.0000758
AC:
3
AN:
39576
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0219
AC:
1874
AN:
85754
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0336
AC:
1796
AN:
53378
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.0353
AC:
202
AN:
5724
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0657
AC:
71583
AN:
1090104
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0456
AC:
2717
AN:
59582
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.467
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
3222
6444
9666
12888
16110
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
2594
5188
7782
10376
12970
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0379
AC:
5772
AN:
152294
Hom.:
154
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0352
AC XY:
2621
AN XY:
74474
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0119
AC:
495
AN:
41566
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0267
AC:
409
AN:
15298
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0493
AC:
171
AN:
3468
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.000193
AC:
1
AN:
5184
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0174
AC:
84
AN:
4828
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0287
AC:
305
AN:
10610
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.0476
AC:
14
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0607
AC:
4131
AN:
68020
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0369
AC:
78
AN:
2114
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.500
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
287
574
860
1147
1434
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
70
140
210
280
350
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.0566
Hom.:
891
Bravo
AF:
0.0375
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00953
AC:
34
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.0599
EpiControl
AF:
0.0622

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:8
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:4
-
Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Likely benign based on allele frequency in 1000 Genomes Project or ESP global frequency and its presence in a patient with a rare or unrelated disease phenotype. NOT Sanger confirmed. -

Nov 26, 2014
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

p.Ser8500Ser in exon 182 of NEB: This variant is not expected to have clinical s ignificance because it has been identified in 6.5% (530/8194) of European Americ an chromosomes by the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (http://evs.gs.washington.e du/EVS/; dbSNP rs13031275). -

-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Feb 26, 2016
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Nemaline myopathy 2 Benign:3
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Sep 16, 2020
Natera, Inc.
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:1
-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.53
CADD
Benign
1.9
DANN
Benign
0.75
PhyloP100
-0.80
Mutation Taster
=96/4
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs13031275; hg19: chr2-152346494; API