rs13097628

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1

The NM_001106.4(ACVR2B):​c.811-13T>C variant causes a splice polypyrimidine tract, intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.527 in 1,612,976 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 232,383 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.43 ( 16310 hom., cov: 31)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.54 ( 216073 hom. )

Consequence

ACVR2B
NM_001106.4 splice_polypyrimidine_tract, intron

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:11

Conservation

PhyloP100: 2.35
Variant links:
Genes affected
ACVR2B (HGNC:174): (activin A receptor type 2B) Activins are dimeric growth and differentiation factors which belong to the transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-beta) superfamily of structurally related signaling proteins. Activins signal through a heteromeric complex of receptor serine kinases which include at least two type I (I and IB) and two type II (II and IIB) receptors. These receptors are all transmembrane proteins, composed of a ligand-binding extracellular domain with cysteine-rich region, a transmembrane domain, and a cytoplasmic domain with predicted serine/threonine specificity. Type I receptors are essential for signaling; and type II receptors are required for binding ligands and for expression of type I receptors. Type I and II receptors form a stable complex after ligand binding, resulting in phosphorylation of type I receptors by type II receptors. Type II receptors are considered to be constitutively active kinases. This gene encodes activin A type IIB receptor, which displays a 3- to 4-fold higher affinity for the ligand than activin A type II receptor. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.77).
BP6
Variant 3-38479665-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr3-38479665-T-C is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 257470.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr3-38479665-T-C is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (NFE) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.568 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
ACVR2BNM_001106.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.811-13T>C splice_polypyrimidine_tract_variant, intron_variant ENST00000352511.5 NP_001097.2

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
ACVR2BENST00000352511.5 linkuse as main transcriptc.811-13T>C splice_polypyrimidine_tract_variant, intron_variant 1 NM_001106.4 ENSP00000340361 P1Q13705-1
ACVR2BENST00000461232.1 linkuse as main transcriptn.4600-13T>C splice_polypyrimidine_tract_variant, intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant 1
ACVR2BENST00000465020.5 linkuse as main transcriptn.897-13T>C splice_polypyrimidine_tract_variant, intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant 2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.430
AC:
65343
AN:
151940
Hom.:
16310
Cov.:
31
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.188
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.465
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.388
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.499
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.269
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.510
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.531
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.475
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.573
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.453
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.478
AC:
119884
AN:
250868
Hom.:
30833
AF XY:
0.492
AC XY:
66667
AN XY:
135564
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.184
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.334
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.506
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.270
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.520
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.533
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.572
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.501
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.537
AC:
783894
AN:
1460916
Hom.:
216073
Cov.:
45
AF XY:
0.538
AC XY:
390834
AN XY:
726762
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.173
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.340
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.498
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.305
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.520
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.541
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.568
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.504
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.430
AC:
65352
AN:
152060
Hom.:
16310
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.427
AC XY:
31711
AN XY:
74304
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.188
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.388
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.499
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.269
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.511
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.531
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.573
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.453
Alfa
AF:
0.492
Hom.:
3844
Bravo
AF:
0.404
Asia WGS
AF:
0.404
AC:
1403
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:11
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Heterotaxy, visceral, 4, autosomal Benign:5
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpJan 31, 2024- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingClinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical CenterSep 21, 2015- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDiagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome-Nilou LabJul 14, 2021- -
not specified Benign:4
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingJoint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences-- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLaboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized MedicineMar 28, 2016Variant identified in a genome or exome case(s) and assessed due to predicted null impact of the variant or pathogenic assertions in the literature or databases. Disclaimer: This variant has not undergone full assessment. The following are preliminary notes: Frequency -
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitternot providedBreakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxMar 03, 2015- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.77
CADD
Benign
8.0
DANN
Benign
0.70

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs13097628; hg19: chr3-38521156; API