rs1311056505

Variant names:

Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -6 ACMG points: 0P and 6B. BP4BS1_SupportingBS2

The NM_001376.5(DYNC1H1):c.9554A>C(p.Asn3185Thr) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000013 in 1,614,108 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. N3185S) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0000066 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.000014 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

DYNC1H1
NM_001376.5 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Uncertain significance criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts U:3

Conservation

PhyloP100: 9.32

Publications

1 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

DYNC1H1 (HGNC:2961): (dynein cytoplasmic 1 heavy chain 1) Dyneins are a group of microtubule-activated ATPases that function as molecular motors. They are divided into two subgroups of axonemal and cytoplasmic dyneins. The cytoplasmic dyneins function in intracellular motility, including retrograde axonal transport, protein sorting, organelle movement, and spindle dynamics. Molecules of conventional cytoplasmic dynein are comprised of 2 heavy chain polypeptides and a number of intermediate and light chains.This gene encodes a member of the cytoplasmic dynein heavy chain family. [provided by RefSeq, Oct 2008]

DYNC1H1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

autosomal dominant childhood-onset proximal spinal muscular atrophy without contractures
Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: G2P, Orphanet, Genomics England PanelApp
intellectual disability, autosomal dominant 13
Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: PanelApp Australia, G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
neuronopathy, distal hereditary motor
Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease axonal type 2O
Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Orphanet
autosomal dominant non-syndromic intellectual disability
Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

DYNC1H1 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -6 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.3616117).

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. GnomAdExome4 allele frequency = 0.0000137 (20/1461888) while in subpopulation AFR AF = 0.0000299 (1/33480). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00000931. There are 0 homozygotes in GnomAdExome4. There are 6 alleles in the male GnomAdExome4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 31. This position passed quality control check. Existence of Clinvar submissions makes me limit the strength of this signal to Supporting

BS2

High AC in GnomAdExome4 at 20 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
DYNC1H1	NM_001376.5 link	c.9554A>C	p.Asn3185Thr	missense_variant	Exon 49 of 78	ENST00000360184.10	NP_001367.2

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
DYNC1H1	ENST00000360184.10 link	c.9554A>C	p.Asn3185Thr	missense_variant	Exon 49 of 78	1	NM_001376.5	ENSP00000348965.4

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00000657

AC:

AN:

152220

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000147

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.00000398

AC:

AN:

251404

AF XY:

0.00000736

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00000880

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.0000137

AC:

AN:

1461888

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00000825

AC XY:

AN XY:

727246

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0000299

AC:

AN:

33480

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

44724

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

26136

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

39700

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

86258

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

53416

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5768

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000153

AC:

AN:

1112010

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.0000331

AC:

AN:

60396

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.485

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00000657

AC:

AN:

152220

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00

AC XY:

AN XY:

74366

show subpopulations

⚠️ The allele balance in gnomAD version 4 Genomes is significantly skewed from the expected value of 0.5.

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

41462

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

15284

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3472

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5192

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4828

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10616

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

316

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000147

AC:

AN:

68046

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

2092

⚠️ The allele balance in gnomAD version 4 Genomes is significantly skewed from the expected value of 0.5. (p-value = 0), which strongly suggests a high chance of mosaicism in these individuals.

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.375

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Alfa

AF:

0.00

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00000378

EpiCase

AF:

0.0000545

EpiControl

AF:

0.0000593

ClinVar

Significance: Uncertain significance

Submissions summary: Uncertain:3

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease axonal type 2O

Uncertain:1

Nov 28, 2017

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals with DYNC1H1-related disease. Algorithms developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function (SIFT, PolyPhen-2, Align-GVGD) all suggest that this variant is likely to be tolerated, but these predictions have not been confirmed by published functional studies and their clinical significance is uncertain. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. This sequence change replaces asparagine with threonine at codon 3185 of the DYNC1H1 protein (p.Asn3185Thr). The asparagine residue is highly conserved and there is a small physicochemical difference between asparagine and threonine. This variant is not present in population databases (ExAC no frequency). -

Inborn genetic diseases

Uncertain:1

Apr 25, 2025

Ambry Genetics

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

The c.9554A>C (p.N3185T) alteration is located in exon 49 (coding exon 49) of the DYNC1H1 gene. This alteration results from a A to C substitution at nucleotide position 9554, causing the asparagine (N) at amino acid position 3185 to be replaced by a threonine (T). Based on insufficient or conflicting evidence, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. -

not provided

Uncertain:1

Aug 20, 2019

GeneDx

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

Not observed at a significant frequency in large population cohorts (Lek et al., 2016); In silico analysis, which includes protein predictors and evolutionary conservation, supports that this variant does not alter protein structure/function; Has not been previously published as pathogenic or benign to our knowledge -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.076

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.12

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.41

CADD

Benign

(source)

DANN

Uncertain

0.98

DEOGEN2

Benign

0.36

T;.

Eigen

Benign

0.16

Eigen_PC

Uncertain

0.32

FATHMM_MKL

Pathogenic

0.99

LIST_S2

Pathogenic

0.97

D;D

M_CAP

Benign

0.0038

MetaRNN

Benign

0.36

T;T

MetaSVM

Benign

-1.1

MutationAssessor

Benign

0.97

L;.

PhyloP100

9.3

PrimateAI

Uncertain

0.62

PROVEAN

Benign

-2.0

N;.

REVEL

Benign

0.19

Sift

Benign

0.061

T;.

Polyphen

0.40

B;.

Vest4

0.51

MutPred

0.65

Loss of stability (P = 0.0638);.;

MVP

0.46

MPC

1.5

ClinPred

0.57

GERP RS

5.4

Varity_R

0.23

gMVP

0.85

Mutation Taster

=55/45

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.020

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over