rs1336921050

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -4 ACMG points: 0P and 4B. BP4_ModerateBP6BS2_Supporting

The NM_004360.5(CDH1):​c.1213A>G​(p.Asn405Asp) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000684 in 1,461,876 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: not found (cov: 32)
Exomes š‘“: 0.0000068 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

CDH1
NM_004360.5 missense

Scores

1
18

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:2B:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.405
Variant links:
Genes affected
CDH1 (HGNC:1748): (cadherin 1) This gene encodes a classical cadherin of the cadherin superfamily. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants, at least one of which encodes a preproprotein that is proteolytically processed to generate the mature glycoprotein. This calcium-dependent cell-cell adhesion protein is comprised of five extracellular cadherin repeats, a transmembrane region and a highly conserved cytoplasmic tail. Mutations in this gene are correlated with gastric, breast, colorectal, thyroid and ovarian cancer. Loss of function of this gene is thought to contribute to cancer progression by increasing proliferation, invasion, and/or metastasis. The ectodomain of this protein mediates bacterial adhesion to mammalian cells and the cytoplasmic domain is required for internalization. This gene is present in a gene cluster with other members of the cadherin family on chromosome 16. [provided by RefSeq, Nov 2015]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -4 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.091322094).
BP6
Variant 16-68813388-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr16-68813388-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 483219.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=1, Uncertain_significance=2}.
BS2
High AC in GnomAdExome4 at 10 AD gene. Variant has AC lower than other variant known as pathogenic in the gene, so the strength is limited to Supporting.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
CDH1NM_004360.5 linkc.1213A>G p.Asn405Asp missense_variant Exon 9 of 16 ENST00000261769.10 NP_004351.1 P12830-1A0A0U2ZQU7B3GN61
CDH1NM_001317185.2 linkc.-403A>G 5_prime_UTR_variant Exon 9 of 16 NP_001304114.1 P12830B3GN61Q9UII7
CDH1NM_001317186.2 linkc.-607A>G 5_prime_UTR_variant Exon 9 of 15 NP_001304115.1 P12830B3GN61
CDH1NM_001317184.2 linkc.1137+1125A>G intron_variant Intron 8 of 14 NP_001304113.1 P12830-2B3GN61

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
CDH1ENST00000261769.10 linkc.1213A>G p.Asn405Asp missense_variant Exon 9 of 16 1 NM_004360.5 ENSP00000261769.4 P12830-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
Cov.:
32
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.0000119
AC:
3
AN:
251486
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.0000221
AC XY:
3
AN XY:
135914
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.0000980
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00000684
AC:
10
AN:
1461876
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0000124
AC XY:
9
AN XY:
727246
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.000104
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.0000166
GnomAD4 genome
Cov.:
32

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:2Benign:1
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:1Benign:1
Jan 16, 2024
Ambry Genetics
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Nov 13, 2018
Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Hereditary diffuse gastric adenocarcinoma Uncertain:1
May 20, 2023
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This sequence change replaces asparagine, which is neutral and polar, with aspartic acid, which is acidic and polar, at codon 405 of the CDH1 protein (p.Asn405Asp). This variant is present in population databases (no rsID available, gnomAD 0.01%). This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with CDH1-related conditions. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 483219). Algorithms developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function output the following: SIFT: "Not Available"; PolyPhen-2: "Benign"; Align-GVGD: "Not Available". The aspartic acid amino acid residue is found in multiple mammalian species, which suggests that this missense change does not adversely affect protein function. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.088
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.44
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.66
CADD
Benign
2.4
DANN
Benign
0.73
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.29
T;T;T;.
Eigen
Benign
-1.1
Eigen_PC
Benign
-1.2
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.023
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.53
T;T;T;T
M_CAP
Benign
0.013
T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.091
T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-1.0
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
1.7
L;.;.;.
PrimateAI
Benign
0.30
T
PROVEAN
Uncertain
-2.6
D;.;.;.
REVEL
Benign
0.020
Sift
Benign
0.17
T;.;.;.
Sift4G
Benign
0.57
T;T;T;T
Polyphen
0.0030
B;.;.;.
Vest4
0.20
MutPred
0.31
Loss of catalytic residue at N405 (P = 0.0698);Loss of catalytic residue at N405 (P = 0.0698);Loss of catalytic residue at N405 (P = 0.0698);Loss of catalytic residue at N405 (P = 0.0698);
MVP
0.67
MPC
0.30
ClinPred
0.034
T
GERP RS
-0.65
Varity_R
0.13
gMVP
0.48

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs1336921050; hg19: chr16-68847291; API