rs13398235

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1

The NM_001267550.2(TTN):​c.26681C>T​(p.Pro8894Leu) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0473 in 1,613,384 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 3,935 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/18 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. P8894P) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.080 ( 791 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.044 ( 3144 hom. )

Consequence

TTN
NM_001267550.2 missense

Scores

2
1
14

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:21

Conservation

PhyloP100: 3.70

Publications

11 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
TTN (HGNC:12403): (titin) This gene encodes a large abundant protein of striated muscle. The product of this gene is divided into two regions, a N-terminal I-band and a C-terminal A-band. The I-band, which is the elastic part of the molecule, contains two regions of tandem immunoglobulin domains on either side of a PEVK region that is rich in proline, glutamate, valine and lysine. The A-band, which is thought to act as a protein-ruler, contains a mixture of immunoglobulin and fibronectin repeats, and possesses kinase activity. An N-terminal Z-disc region and a C-terminal M-line region bind to the Z-line and M-line of the sarcomere, respectively, so that a single titin molecule spans half the length of a sarcomere. Titin also contains binding sites for muscle associated proteins so it serves as an adhesion template for the assembly of contractile machinery in muscle cells. It has also been identified as a structural protein for chromosomes. Alternative splicing of this gene results in multiple transcript variants. Considerable variability exists in the I-band, the M-line and the Z-disc regions of titin. Variability in the I-band region contributes to the differences in elasticity of different titin isoforms and, therefore, to the differences in elasticity of different muscle types. Mutations in this gene are associated with familial hypertrophic cardiomyopathy 9, and autoantibodies to titin are produced in patients with the autoimmune disease scleroderma. [provided by RefSeq, Feb 2012]
TTN-AS1 (HGNC:44124): (TTN antisense RNA 1) This gene encodes a non-coding RNA transcribed from the opposite strand to the titin gene. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2016]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.0018868148).
BP6
Variant 2-178713977-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-178713977-G-A is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 46786.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (SAS) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.153 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
TTNNM_001267550.2 linkc.26681C>T p.Pro8894Leu missense_variant Exon 92 of 363 ENST00000589042.5 NP_001254479.2

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
TTNENST00000589042.5 linkc.26681C>T p.Pro8894Leu missense_variant Exon 92 of 363 5 NM_001267550.2 ENSP00000467141.1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0795
AC:
12078
AN:
152008
Hom.:
768
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.152
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.0429
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.145
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.0358
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.0262
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.162
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.0585
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.0475
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0252
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0690
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.0784
AC:
19500
AN:
248598
AF XY:
0.0758
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.152
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.190
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.0409
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.0285
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0576
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0264
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.0598
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0439
AC:
64094
AN:
1461258
Hom.:
3144
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.0460
AC XY:
33433
AN XY:
726888
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.159
AC:
5332
AN:
33460
American (AMR)
AF:
0.188
AC:
8389
AN:
44660
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0400
AC:
1045
AN:
26130
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.0136
AC:
538
AN:
39670
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.159
AC:
13736
AN:
86224
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0590
AC:
3148
AN:
53376
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.0418
AC:
241
AN:
5766
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0257
AC:
28522
AN:
1111632
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0521
AC:
3143
AN:
60340
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.458
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
3419
6838
10258
13677
17096
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
1374
2748
4122
5496
6870
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0798
AC:
12143
AN:
152126
Hom.:
791
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0840
AC XY:
6250
AN XY:
74370
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.153
AC:
6350
AN:
41490
American (AMR)
AF:
0.146
AC:
2226
AN:
15280
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0358
AC:
124
AN:
3468
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.0265
AC:
137
AN:
5172
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.162
AC:
780
AN:
4812
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0585
AC:
619
AN:
10590
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.0442
AC:
13
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0252
AC:
1711
AN:
68000
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0682
AC:
144
AN:
2110
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.504
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
546
1091
1637
2182
2728
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
136
272
408
544
680
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.0407
Hom.:
1138
Bravo
AF:
0.0864
TwinsUK
AF:
0.0240
AC:
89
ALSPAC
AF:
0.0241
AC:
93
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.140
AC:
531
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.0256
AC:
211
ExAC
AF:
0.0747
AC:
9025
Asia WGS
AF:
0.118
AC:
409
AN:
3476
EpiCase
AF:
0.0241
EpiControl
AF:
0.0253

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:21
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:9
Apr 09, 2025
Molecular Diagnostic Laboratory for Inherited Cardiovascular Disease, Montreal Heart Institute
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Jun 24, 2013
Biesecker Lab/Clinical Genomics Section, National Institutes of Health
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:research

Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Oct 26, 2012
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease.

Aug 16, 2020
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Sep 27, 2011
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Aug 15, 2013
Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Autosomal recessive limb-girdle muscular dystrophy type 2J Benign:2
Sep 10, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease.

Early-onset myopathy with fatal cardiomyopathy Benign:2
Sep 10, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease.

Tibial muscular dystrophy Benign:2
Sep 10, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease.

Myopathy, myofibrillar, 9, with early respiratory failure Benign:2
Sep 10, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease.

Autosomal recessive limb-girdle muscular dystrophy type 2J;C1858763:Dilated cardiomyopathy 1G Benign:1
Feb 04, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Dilated cardiomyopathy 1G Benign:1
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease.

not provided Benign:1
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Jan 16, 2013
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity.

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.082
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.59
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.48
CADD
Benign
21
DANN
Benign
0.81
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.0
.;.;.;.
Eigen
Benign
-0.29
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.092
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
0.81
D
LIST_S2
Benign
0.70
T;T;.;T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0019
T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-1.1
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
0.0
.;.;.;.
PhyloP100
3.7
PrimateAI
Benign
0.41
T
PROVEAN
Pathogenic
-4.7
D;.;.;.
REVEL
Benign
0.16
Sift
Benign
0.76
T;.;.;.
Sift4G
Pathogenic
0.0
.;.;.;.
Vest4
0.10
ClinPred
0.023
T
GERP RS
6.1
Mutation Taster
=96/4
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs13398235; hg19: chr2-179578704; COSMIC: COSV60092646; COSMIC: COSV60092646; API