rs13402787

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1

The NM_015702.3(MMADHC):​c.478+6T>G variant causes a splice region, intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0029 in 1,576,222 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 122 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 3/3 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.015 ( 58 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0016 ( 64 hom. )

Consequence

MMADHC
NM_015702.3 splice_region, intron

Scores

2
Splicing: ADA: 0.0004755
2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:7

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.00

Publications

3 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
MMADHC (HGNC:25221): (metabolism of cobalamin associated D) This gene encodes a mitochondrial protein that is involved in an early step of vitamin B12 metabolism. Vitamin B12 (cobalamin) is essential for normal development and survival in humans. Mutations in this gene cause methylmalonic aciduria and homocystinuria type cblD (MMADHC), a disorder of cobalamin metabolism that is characterized by decreased levels of the coenzymes adenosylcobalamin and methylcobalamin. Pseudogenes have been identified on chromosomes 11 and X.[provided by RefSeq, Nov 2008]
MMADHC Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • inborn disorder of cobalamin metabolism and transport
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, ClinGen
  • methylmalonic aciduria and homocystinuria type cblD
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, MODERATE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, G2P, Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.82).
BP6
Variant 2-149576431-A-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-149576431-A-C is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 331378.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.0507 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
MMADHCNM_015702.3 linkc.478+6T>G splice_region_variant, intron_variant Intron 5 of 7 ENST00000303319.10 NP_056517.1 Q9H3L0

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
MMADHCENST00000303319.10 linkc.478+6T>G splice_region_variant, intron_variant Intron 5 of 7 1 NM_015702.3 ENSP00000301920.5 Q9H3L0
MMADHCENST00000422782.2 linkc.478+6T>G splice_region_variant, intron_variant Intron 5 of 8 5 ENSP00000408331.2 F8WEC0
MMADHCENST00000428879.5 linkc.478+6T>G splice_region_variant, intron_variant Intron 4 of 6 2 ENSP00000389060.1 Q9H3L0

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0151
AC:
2295
AN:
152168
Hom.:
56
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0522
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00615
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00316
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000250
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0105
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.00392
AC:
986
AN:
251286
AF XY:
0.00283
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0527
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00272
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000150
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00261
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00158
AC:
2255
AN:
1423936
Hom.:
64
Cov.:
24
AF XY:
0.00134
AC XY:
956
AN XY:
711002
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0548
AC:
1799
AN:
32824
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00318
AC:
142
AN:
44632
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
25920
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
39422
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.000105
AC:
9
AN:
85486
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
53394
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00281
AC:
16
AN:
5688
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0000622
AC:
67
AN:
1077462
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00376
AC:
222
AN:
59108
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.470
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
92
183
275
366
458
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
58
116
174
232
290
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0152
AC:
2315
AN:
152286
Hom.:
58
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0147
AC XY:
1098
AN XY:
74460
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0525
AC:
2181
AN:
41554
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00615
AC:
94
AN:
15296
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3472
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5182
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
4826
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10618
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00340
AC:
1
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000250
AC:
17
AN:
68016
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0104
AC:
22
AN:
2116
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.499
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
118
236
355
473
591
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
22
44
66
88
110
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.00764
Hom.:
25
Bravo
AF:
0.0178
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00577
AC:
20
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.0000545
EpiControl
AF:
0.000178

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:7
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Methylmalonic aciduria and homocystinuria type cblD Benign:3
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Jan 23, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Sep 16, 2020
Natera, Inc.
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:3
-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

Sep 08, 2023
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Mar 03, 2015
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Disorders of Intracellular Cobalamin Metabolism Benign:1
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.82
CADD
Benign
8.1
DANN
Benign
0.62
PhyloP100
1.0
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
dbscSNV1_ADA
Benign
0.00048
dbscSNV1_RF
Benign
0.036
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs13402787; hg19: chr2-150432945; API