rs1348690

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1

The NM_001369.3(DNAH5):​c.6444+8A>G variant causes a splice region, intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00493 in 1,614,000 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 357 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 3/3 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.027 ( 185 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0026 ( 172 hom. )

Consequence

DNAH5
NM_001369.3 splice_region, intron

Scores

2
Splicing: ADA: 0.00002441
2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:8

Conservation

PhyloP100: -3.24
Variant links:
Genes affected
DNAH5 (HGNC:2950): (dynein axonemal heavy chain 5) This gene encodes a dynein protein, which is part of a microtubule-associated motor protein complex consisting of heavy, light, and intermediate chains. This protein is an axonemal heavy chain dynein. It functions as a force-generating protein with ATPase activity, whereby the release of ADP is thought to produce the force-producing power stroke. Mutations in this gene cause primary ciliary dyskinesia type 3, as well as Kartagener syndrome, which are both diseases due to ciliary defects. [provided by RefSeq, Oct 2009]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.87).
BP6
Variant 5-13829502-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr5-13829502-T-C is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 226603.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr5-13829502-T-C is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.0917 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
DNAH5NM_001369.3 linkc.6444+8A>G splice_region_variant, intron_variant Intron 38 of 78 ENST00000265104.5 NP_001360.1 Q8TE73

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
DNAH5ENST00000265104.5 linkc.6444+8A>G splice_region_variant, intron_variant Intron 38 of 78 1 NM_001369.3 ENSP00000265104.4 Q8TE73
DNAH5ENST00000681290.1 linkc.6399+8A>G splice_region_variant, intron_variant Intron 38 of 78 ENSP00000505288.1 A0A7P0Z455
DNAH5ENST00000683090.1 linkn.1375+8A>G splice_region_variant, intron_variant Intron 3 of 6

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0270
AC:
4103
AN:
152166
Hom.:
185
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0942
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00995
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000207
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00316
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000235
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0153
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00691
AC:
1736
AN:
251276
Hom.:
81
AF XY:
0.00488
AC XY:
663
AN XY:
135798
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0947
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00428
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.000109
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.0000980
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000141
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00456
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00263
AC:
3846
AN:
1461716
Hom.:
172
Cov.:
37
AF XY:
0.00223
AC XY:
1621
AN XY:
727168
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0957
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00456
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.0000504
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.000220
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0000540
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00561
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0270
AC:
4114
AN:
152284
Hom.:
185
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.0264
AC XY:
1964
AN XY:
74464
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0942
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00993
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.000235
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.0151
Alfa
AF:
0.00897
Hom.:
81
Bravo
AF:
0.0313
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00491
AC:
18
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.000382
EpiControl
AF:
0.000237

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:8
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:2
Feb 21, 2013
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

6444+8A>G in intron 38 of DNAH5: This variant is not expected to have clinical s ignificance because it is not located within the conserved splice consensus sequ ence. It has been identified in 9.2% (404/4406) of African American chromosomes from a broad population by the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (http://evs.gs.was hington.edu/EVS; dbSNP rs1348690). -

-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Primary ciliary dyskinesia Benign:2
Sep 16, 2020
Natera, Inc.
Significance: Benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jan 30, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:2
Dec 24, 2019
GeneDx
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: not provided

- -

Primary ciliary dyskinesia 3 Benign:2
Mar 06, 2017
Counsyl
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.87
CADD
Benign
0.30
DANN
Benign
0.57

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
dbscSNV1_ADA
Benign
0.000024
dbscSNV1_RF
Benign
0.0020
SpliceAI score (max)
0.020
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs1348690; hg19: chr5-13829611; API