rs13551

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1

The NM_000147.5(FUCA1):​c.857A>G​(p.Gln286Arg) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.311 in 1,613,656 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 81,648 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 16/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. Q286Q) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.27 ( 6033 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.32 ( 75615 hom. )

Consequence

FUCA1
NM_000147.5 missense

Scores

18

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:7

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.687

Publications

40 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
FUCA1 (HGNC:4006): (alpha-L-fucosidase 1) The protein encoded by this gene is a lysosomal enzyme involved in the degradation of fucose-containing glycoproteins and glycolipids. Mutations in this gene are associated with fucosidosis (FUCA1D), which is an autosomal recessive lysosomal storage disease. A pseudogene of this locus is present on chr 2.[provided by RefSeq, Oct 2009]
FUCA1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • fucosidosis
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Orphanet, G2P, Genomics England PanelApp, Ambry Genetics, ClinGen

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=4.5064092E-4).
BP6
Variant 1-23854472-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr1-23854472-T-C is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 691.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (NFE) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.331 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
FUCA1NM_000147.5 linkc.857A>G p.Gln286Arg missense_variant Exon 5 of 8 ENST00000374479.4 NP_000138.2 P04066

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
FUCA1ENST00000374479.4 linkc.857A>G p.Gln286Arg missense_variant Exon 5 of 8 1 NM_000147.5 ENSP00000363603.3 P04066

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.268
AC:
40805
AN:
152038
Hom.:
6032
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.145
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.421
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.238
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.295
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.263
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.148
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.400
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.215
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.335
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.288
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.279
AC:
70217
AN:
251490
AF XY:
0.278
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.141
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.204
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.301
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.265
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.384
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.336
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.296
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.315
AC:
460378
AN:
1461500
Hom.:
75615
Cov.:
36
AF XY:
0.311
AC XY:
226103
AN XY:
727112
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.136
AC:
4553
AN:
33478
American (AMR)
AF:
0.207
AC:
9274
AN:
44724
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.305
AC:
7975
AN:
26136
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.253
AC:
10056
AN:
39698
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.155
AC:
13377
AN:
86256
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.393
AC:
20977
AN:
53420
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.235
AC:
1357
AN:
5768
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.337
AC:
374375
AN:
1111646
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.305
AC:
18434
AN:
60374
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.482
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
16935
33869
50804
67738
84673
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
11804
23608
35412
47216
59020
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.268
AC:
40816
AN:
152156
Hom.:
6033
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.266
AC XY:
19773
AN XY:
74378
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.145
AC:
6011
AN:
41538
American (AMR)
AF:
0.239
AC:
3647
AN:
15278
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.295
AC:
1022
AN:
3470
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.264
AC:
1370
AN:
5182
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.148
AC:
714
AN:
4832
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.400
AC:
4217
AN:
10554
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.224
AC:
66
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.335
AC:
22783
AN:
67988
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.286
AC:
604
AN:
2112
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.501
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1481
2962
4442
5923
7404
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
408
816
1224
1632
2040
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.304
Hom.:
17095
Bravo
AF:
0.254
TwinsUK
AF:
0.346
AC:
1283
ALSPAC
AF:
0.331
AC:
1274
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.146
AC:
643
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.331
AC:
2845
ExAC
AF:
0.279
AC:
33884
Asia WGS
AF:
0.187
AC:
652
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.325
EpiControl
AF:
0.315

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:7
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:4
May 02, 2017
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Variant summary: The FUCA1 c.857A>G (p.Gln286Arg) variant involves the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. 3/4 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant, however experimental findings confirmed, that Q289R retained its functional activity. This variant was found in 33884/121394 control chromosomes (5299 homozygotes) at a frequency of 0.2791242, which is approximately 250 times the estimated maximal expected allele frequency of a pathogenic FUCA1 variant (0.001118), strong evidence that this variant is a benign polymorphism. The variant has been reported in the literature in affected individuals who also carry known pathogenic FUCA1 variants, and has been shown to be present in the homozygous state in numerous unaffected relatives, indicating the variant does not segregate with disease. In addition, multiple clinical diagnostic laboratories/reputable databases classified this variant as benign. Taken together, this variant is classified as benign. -

Oct 22, 2015
Mayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo Clinic
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jun 13, 2018
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

Fucosidosis Benign:2
Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

FU1/FU2 POLYMORPHISM Benign:1
Aug 01, 1994
OMIM
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:literature only

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.078
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.69
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.61
CADD
Benign
17
DANN
Benign
0.97
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.033
T
Eigen
Benign
-0.76
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.76
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.092
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.79
T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.00045
T
MetaSVM
Benign
-1.0
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
0.24
N
PhyloP100
0.69
PrimateAI
Benign
0.27
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-0.42
N
REVEL
Benign
0.057
Sift
Benign
0.038
D
Sift4G
Benign
0.074
T
Polyphen
0.0010
B
Vest4
0.014
MPC
0.35
ClinPred
0.0057
T
GERP RS
3.6
Varity_R
0.093
gMVP
0.58
Mutation Taster
=99/1
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs13551; hg19: chr1-24180962; COSMIC: COSV65698861; API