Menu
GeneBe

rs13551

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1

The NM_000147.5(FUCA1):c.857A>G(p.Gln286Arg) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.311 in 1,613,656 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 81,648 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.27 ( 6033 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.32 ( 75615 hom. )

Consequence

FUCA1
NM_000147.5 missense

Scores

18

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:6

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.687
Variant links:
Genes affected
FUCA1 (HGNC:4006): (alpha-L-fucosidase 1) The protein encoded by this gene is a lysosomal enzyme involved in the degradation of fucose-containing glycoproteins and glycolipids. Mutations in this gene are associated with fucosidosis (FUCA1D), which is an autosomal recessive lysosomal storage disease. A pseudogene of this locus is present on chr 2.[provided by RefSeq, Oct 2009]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=4.5064092E-4).
BP6
Variant 1-23854472-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr1-23854472-T-C is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 691.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (NFE) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.331 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
FUCA1NM_000147.5 linkuse as main transcriptc.857A>G p.Gln286Arg missense_variant 5/8 ENST00000374479.4

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
FUCA1ENST00000374479.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.857A>G p.Gln286Arg missense_variant 5/81 NM_000147.5 P1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.268
AC:
40805
AN:
152038
Hom.:
6032
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.145
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.421
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.238
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.295
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.263
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.148
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.400
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.215
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.335
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.288
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.279
AC:
70217
AN:
251490
Hom.:
10693
AF XY:
0.278
AC XY:
37816
AN XY:
135922
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.141
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.204
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.301
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.265
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.152
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.384
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.336
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.296
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.315
AC:
460378
AN:
1461500
Hom.:
75615
Cov.:
36
AF XY:
0.311
AC XY:
226103
AN XY:
727112
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.136
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.207
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.305
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.253
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.155
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.393
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.337
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.305
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.268
AC:
40816
AN:
152156
Hom.:
6033
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.266
AC XY:
19773
AN XY:
74378
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.145
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.239
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.295
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.264
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.148
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.400
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.335
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.286
Alfa
AF:
0.313
Hom.:
12852
Bravo
AF:
0.254
TwinsUK
AF:
0.346
AC:
1283
ALSPAC
AF:
0.331
AC:
1274
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.146
AC:
643
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.331
AC:
2845
ExAC
AF:
0.279
AC:
33884
Asia WGS
AF:
0.187
AC:
652
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.325
EpiControl
AF:
0.315

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:6
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxJun 13, 2018This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpMay 02, 2017Variant summary: The FUCA1 c.857A>G (p.Gln286Arg) variant involves the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. 3/4 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant, however experimental findings confirmed, that Q289R retained its functional activity. This variant was found in 33884/121394 control chromosomes (5299 homozygotes) at a frequency of 0.2791242, which is approximately 250 times the estimated maximal expected allele frequency of a pathogenic FUCA1 variant (0.001118), strong evidence that this variant is a benign polymorphism. The variant has been reported in the literature in affected individuals who also carry known pathogenic FUCA1 variants, and has been shown to be present in the homozygous state in numerous unaffected relatives, indicating the variant does not segregate with disease. In addition, multiple clinical diagnostic laboratories/reputable databases classified this variant as benign. Taken together, this variant is classified as benign. -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingMayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo ClinicOct 22, 2015- -
Fucosidosis Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeFeb 01, 2024- -
FU1/FU2 POLYMORPHISM Benign:1
Benign, no assertion criteria providedliterature onlyOMIMAug 01, 1994- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.078
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.69
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.61
Cadd
Benign
17
Dann
Benign
0.97
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.033
T
Eigen
Benign
-0.76
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.76
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.092
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.79
T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.00045
T
MetaSVM
Benign
-1.0
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
0.24
N
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
P
PrimateAI
Benign
0.27
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-0.42
N
REVEL
Benign
0.057
Sift
Benign
0.038
D
Sift4G
Benign
0.074
T
Polyphen
0.0010
B
Vest4
0.014
MPC
0.35
ClinPred
0.0057
T
GERP RS
3.6
Varity_R
0.093
gMVP
0.58

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs13551; hg19: chr1-24180962; COSMIC: COSV65698861; API