rs1363348500
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely pathogenic. The variant received 9 ACMG points: 9P and 0B. PM2PM5PP2PP3_ModeratePP5_Moderate
The NM_002804.5(PSMC3):c.910C>T(p.Arg304Trp) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant was absent in control chromosomes in GnomAD project. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Pathogenic (★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R304G) has been classified as Pathogenic.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_002804.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- complex neurodevelopmental disorderInheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Ambry Genetics
- neurodevelopmental disorderInheritance: AD Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: G2P
- deafness, cataract, impaired intellectual development, and polyneuropathyInheritance: AR Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_pathogenic. The variant received 9 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_002804.5. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PSMC3 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.910C>T | p.Arg304Trp | missense | Exon 9 of 12 | ENSP00000298852.3 | P17980 | ||
| PSMC3 | TSL:1 | c.910C>T | p.Arg304Trp | missense | Exon 9 of 12 | ENSP00000481029.1 | P17980 | ||
| PSMC3 | TSL:1 | c.862C>T | p.Arg288Trp | missense | Exon 9 of 12 | ENSP00000473652.1 | R4GNH3 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 31
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.00 AC: 0AN: 165808 AF XY: 0.00
GnomAD4 exome Data not reliable, filtered out with message: AC0 AF: 0.00 AC: 0AN: 1405132Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 693660
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 31
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at